These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8322692)

  • 1. Sensitivity and reproducibility of the instantaneous hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index compared to coronary flow reserve for the assessment of stenosis severity.
    Cleary RM; Moore NB; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
    Am Heart J; 1993 Jul; 126(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 8322692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instantaneous hyperemic flow-versus-pressure slope index. Microsphere validation of an alternative to measures of coronary reserve.
    Mancini GB; Cleary RM; DeBoe SF; Moore NB; Gallagher KP
    Circulation; 1991 Aug; 84(2):862-70. PubMed ID: 1860227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diastolic hyperemic flow versus pressure relation. A new index of coronary stenosis severity and flow reserve.
    Mancini GB; McGillem MJ; DeBoe SF; Gallagher KP
    Circulation; 1989 Oct; 80(4):941-50. PubMed ID: 2791252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slope of the instantaneous hyperemic diastolic coronary flow velocity-pressure relation. A new index for assessment of the physiological significance of coronary stenosis in humans.
    Di Mario C; Krams R; Gil R; Serruys PW
    Circulation; 1994 Sep; 90(3):1215-24. PubMed ID: 8087931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tachycardia, contractility and volume loading alter conventional indexes of coronary flow reserve, but not the instantaneous hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index.
    Cleary RM; Ayon D; Moore NB; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Nov; 20(5):1261-9. PubMed ID: 1401630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of coronary flow reserve with the instantaneous coronary flow velocity versus pressure relation: a new index of coronary flow reserve independent of perfusion pressure.
    Kondo M; Azuma A; Yamada H; Kohno H; Kawata K; Tatsukawa H; Ohnishi K; Kohno Y; Asayama J; Nakagawa M
    Am Heart J; 1996 Dec; 132(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 8969563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve.
    Meimoun P; Clerc J; Ardourel D; Djou U; Martis S; Botoro T; Elmkies F; Zemir H; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):999-1007. PubMed ID: 27752796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5'-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics.
    Jeremias A; Filardo SD; Whitbourn RJ; Kernoff RS; Yeung AC; Fitzgerald PJ; Yock PG
    Circulation; 2000 Jan; 101(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 10645929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital angiographic impulse response analysis of myocardial perfusion: influence of heart rate and blood pressure changes on microcirculatory transit time measurement in the normal canine coronary circulation.
    Solzbach U; Liao J; Whiting JS; Eigler NL
    Comput Biomed Res; 1995 Oct; 28(5):371-92. PubMed ID: 8612400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of coronary flow reserve by coronary pressure measurement: comparison with flow- or velocity-derived coronary flow reserve.
    Akasaka T; Yamamuro A; Kamiyama N; Koyama Y; Akiyama M; Watanabe N; Neishi Y; Takagi T; Shalman E; Barak C; Yoshida K
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 May; 41(9):1554-60. PubMed ID: 12742297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postocclusion hyperemia provides a better estimate of coronary reserve than intracoronary adenosine in patients with coronary artery stenosis.
    Nitenberg A; Durand E; Delatour B; Sdiri W; Raha S; Lafont A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 19(9):390-4. PubMed ID: 17827509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve.
    de Bruyne B; Bartunek J; Sys SU; Pijls NH; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W
    Circulation; 1996 Oct; 94(8):1842-9. PubMed ID: 8873658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Can adenosine triphosphate induce maximal hyperemic response in patients with impaired coronary microcirculation?: comparison of hyperemic response to adenosine triphosphate administered by intravenous and by intracoronary injection using Doppler guide wire].
    Yanagi S; Hirota K; Nagae K; Abe Y; Hasegawa T; Okada M; Ota T; Yoshikawa J
    J Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 39(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11828792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity information during baseline conditions: adenosine-free assessment of functional coronary lesion severity.
    van de Hoef TP; Nolte F; Damman P; Delewi R; Bax M; Chamuleau SA; Voskuil M; Siebes M; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ; Meuwissen M
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 5(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 22787017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of pharmacological 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses.
    Miller DD; Donohue TJ; Younis LT; Bach RG; Aguirre FV; Wittry MD; Goodgold HM; Chaitman BR; Kern MJ
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2150-60. PubMed ID: 8181140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between non-invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity.
    Meimoun P; Sayah S; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J; Elmkies F; Benali T; Zemir H; Doutrelan L; Clerc J
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Apr; 24(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 21353763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure.
    Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Kim CH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Koo BK
    Circulation; 2017 Nov; 136(19):1798-1808. PubMed ID: 28851731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Jeremias A; Whitbourn RJ; Filardo SD; Fitzgerald PJ; Cohen DJ; Tuzcu EM; Anderson WD; Abizaid AA; Mintz GS; Yeung AC; Kern MJ; Yock PG
    Am Heart J; 2000 Oct; 140(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 11011341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interstudy variability of coronary flow reserve. Influence of heart rate, arterial pressure, and ventricular preload.
    McGinn AL; White CW; Wilson RF
    Circulation; 1990 Apr; 81(4):1319-30. PubMed ID: 2317912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio and non-invasive coronary flow reserve.
    Meimoun P; Clerc J; Ardourel D; Martis S; Djou U; Botoro T; Boulanger J; Elmkies F; Zemir H
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2016 Nov; 65(5):380-381. PubMed ID: 27968774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.