BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8325752)

  • 1. Tonic interocular suppression, binocular summation, and the visual evoked potential.
    Eysteinsson T; Barris MC; Denny N; Frumkes TE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jul; 34(8):2443-8. PubMed ID: 8325752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tonic interocular suppression and binocular summation in human vision.
    Denny N; Frumkes TE; Barris MC; Eysteinsson T
    J Physiol; 1991 Jun; 437():449-60. PubMed ID: 1890644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities.
    Hale J; Harrad RA; McKee SP; Pettet MW; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1786-90. PubMed ID: 15851583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular VEP summation in infants and adults with abnormal binocular histories.
    Shea SL; Aslin RN; McCulloch D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 Feb; 28(2):356-65. PubMed ID: 8591919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of attention on the VEP in binocular and monocular conditions.
    Heravian-Shandiz J; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 1293531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants.
    Brown RJ; Candy TR; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(13):3324-33. PubMed ID: 10586959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interocular transfer of orientation-specific fMRI adaptation reveals amblyopia-related deficits in humans.
    Jurcoane A; Choubey B; Mitsieva D; Muckli L; Sireteanu R
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1681-92. PubMed ID: 19371760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binocular summation improves performance to defocus-induced blur.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Atchison DA; Tsilimbaris MK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 52(5):2784-9. PubMed ID: 21228386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    James AC; Ruseckaite R; Maddess T
    Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15842740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems.
    Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1522-31. PubMed ID: 18501948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Dawson WW; Compton JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Mar; 22(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 7061211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pattern reversal VER as a tool for evaluating unbalanced visual inputs between the two eyes.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T; Uemura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1988; 32(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 3411817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binocular interaction reflected in visually evoked cortical potentials as studied with pseudorandom stimuli.
    Sato E; Taniai M; Mizota A; Adachi-Usami E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Oct; 43(10):3355-8. PubMed ID: 12356845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binocular summation in visually evoked responses and visual acuity.
    Heravian JS; Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jul; 10(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 2216474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel way to make transient-VEPs a better predictor of human binocular integration.
    Lefebvre L; Théoret H; Saint-Amour D
    Neuroreport; 2010 Nov; 21(16):1023-8. PubMed ID: 20827225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.
    di Summa A; Fusina S; Bertolasi L; Vicentini S; Perlini S; Bongiovanni LG; Polo A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1999; 98(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 10947000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rotated prism-wear disrupts emmetropization but does not reliably induce hyperopia in the New World monkey.
    Whatham AR; Judge SJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3324-34. PubMed ID: 17967473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dazzle reflex: electrophysiological signals from ocular muscles reveal strong binocular summation effects.
    Plainis S; Murray IJ; Carden D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 May; 26(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 16684158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.