These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8326057)

  • 1. Acoustic distortion as a measure of frequency selectivity: relation to psychophysical equivalent rectangular bandwidth.
    Brown AM; Gaskill SA; Carlyon RP; Williams DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3291-7. PubMed ID: 8326057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of aspirin on cochlear mechanical tuning.
    Brown AM; Williams DM; Gaskill SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3298-307. PubMed ID: 8326058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear.
    Williams DM; Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):127-46. PubMed ID: 9119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.
    Harris FP; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Stagner BB; Coats AC; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 2921404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.
    Gaskill SA; Brown AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):821-39. PubMed ID: 2212308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear.
    Brown AM; Gaskill SA; Williams DM
    Proc Biol Sci; 1992 Oct; 250(1327):29-34. PubMed ID: 1361059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
    Formby C; Sachs RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements.
    Allen JB; Fahey PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):809-16. PubMed ID: 8370887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears.
    Zurek PM; Clark WW; Kim DO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):774-80. PubMed ID: 7130536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
    Canlon B; Marklund K; Borg E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2f1-f2 distortion product.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):850-6. PubMed ID: 2212310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones.
    Furst M; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 3411050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus ratio dependence of low-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Christensen AT; Ordoñez R; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):679-89. PubMed ID: 25698003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
    Wittekindt A; Gaese BH; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inner hair cell responses to the 2f1-f2 intermodulation distortion product.
    Nuttall AL; Dolan DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):782-90. PubMed ID: 2307775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.