These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8326057)

  • 21. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears.
    Stover LJ; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2669-78. PubMed ID: 10573884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development of cochlear frequency resolution in the human auditory system.
    Abdala C; Sininger YS
    Ear Hear; 1996 Oct; 17(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 8909885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychophysical measures of two-tone suppression and distortion products (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1).
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):930-50. PubMed ID: 6841819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.
    He NJ; Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2659-69. PubMed ID: 8270742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High frequency distortion products from the ears of two bat species, Megaderma lyra and Carollia perspicillata.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1992 Jul; 60(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 1639726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.
    Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3473-83. PubMed ID: 10615687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Further studies on the mechanics of the cochlear partition in the mustached bat. II. A second cochlear frequency map derived from acoustic distortion products.
    Kössl M; Vater M
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):78-86. PubMed ID: 8789813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic distortion products from the cochlea of the blind African mole rat, Cryptomys spec.
    Kössl M; Frank G; Burda H; Müller M
    J Comp Physiol A; 1996; 178(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 8583425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of non-linear cochlear mechanics in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica: ancestral and modern mammalian features.
    Faulstich M; Kössl M; Reimer K
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):47-53. PubMed ID: 8789810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.
    Oxenham AJ; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 14716510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.