101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8326058)
1. The effect of aspirin on cochlear mechanical tuning.
Brown AM; Williams DM; Gaskill SA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3298-307. PubMed ID: 8326058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustic distortion as a measure of frequency selectivity: relation to psychophysical equivalent rectangular bandwidth.
Brown AM; Gaskill SA; Carlyon RP; Williams DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3291-7. PubMed ID: 8326057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear.
Williams DM; Brown AM
Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):127-46. PubMed ID: 9119756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial dissociation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and distortion products during aspirin use in humans.
Wier CC; Pasanen EG; McFadden D
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):230-7. PubMed ID: 3411052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.
Long G
Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of aspirin on distortion product fine structure: interpreted by the two-source model for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation.
Rao A; Long GR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):792-800. PubMed ID: 21361438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of aspirin on phase gradient of 2F1-F2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Parazzini M; Hall AJ; Lutman ME; Kapadia S
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):44-52. PubMed ID: 15953514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption.
Long GR; Tubis A
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1343-53. PubMed ID: 3198870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
Williams EJ; Bacon SP
Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Otoacoustic emission estimates of human basilar membrane impulse response duration and cochlear filter tuning.
Raufer S; Verhulst S
Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():150-160. PubMed ID: 27989947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitization to masked tones following notched-noise correlates with estimates of cochlear function using distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Zhou X; Henin S; Thompson SE; Long GR; Parra LC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):970-6. PubMed ID: 20136219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulfate.
McFadden D; Pasanen EG
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3460-74. PubMed ID: 8046138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.
Long GR; Talmadge CL; Lee J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1613-26. PubMed ID: 19045653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antioxidant treatment reduces blast-induced cochlear damage and hearing loss.
Ewert DL; Lu J; Li W; Du X; Floyd R; Kopke R
Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):29-39. PubMed ID: 22326291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear, brainstem, and psychophysical responses show spectrotemporal tradeoff in human auditory processing.
Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
Neuroreport; 2017 Jan; 28(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 27893606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.
He NJ; Schmiedt RA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2659-69. PubMed ID: 8270742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
