117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8327711)
1. Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymmetric screen-film imaging system.
Gray JE; Stears JG; Swensen SJ; Bunch PC
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 8327711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical evaluation of asymmetric film-screen system for thoracic lesions].
Shimizu T; Yamamoto K; Ogura Y; Aratake K; Nakata Y; Saika Y; Sagami A; Ashina K; Sueyoshi K; Narabayashi I
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 54(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8028952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The value of the InSight HC asymmetric film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis].
Häussler MD; Lenzen H; Reckels C; Peters PE
Rofo; 1994 Mar; 160(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 8136481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Experiences with a new film-screen system in pediatric thoracic radiography].
Leenen A; Brandt GA; Riebel T; Marciniak H
Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 8963046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Thoracic radiography. Comparison of asymmetric screen-film, technic of mechanical homogenization, and conventional technics].
Ciccotosto C; Bartelli F; Bellelli M; Gavelli G; Guidotti A; Pirronti T; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1995; 90(1-2):24-32. PubMed ID: 7569092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short communication: use of the European image quality criteria for screen-film comparison--application for asymmetric systems.
Guibelalde E; Morillo A; Fernandez JM; Vañó E
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):64-9. PubMed ID: 8785624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
