BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8328360)

  • 1. Comparison of earphone and sound field methods for estimating noise attenuation of foam earplugs.
    Carter NL; Upfold G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jun; 54(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 8328360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of an earphone-support device for measuring earplug attenuation.
    Dolan TG; Maurer JF; Dickinson LG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Feb; 54(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 8452096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attenuation provided by four different audiometric earphone systems.
    Frank T; Wright DC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 2307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Attenuation of ultrasonic noise in the 10-16 kHz frequency range by earplugs].
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Med Pr; 2018 Aug; 69(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 29953113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Most comfortable loudness shift as a measure of speech attenuation by hearing protectors.
    Letowski T; Burstein N; Clark J; Romanowski L; Sevec A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Apr; 56(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 7726101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing thresholds, threshold repeatability, and attenuation values for passive noise-reducing earphone enclosures.
    Frank T; Greer AC; Magistro DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Nov; 58(11):772-8. PubMed ID: 9373922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance.
    Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Harris DA; Johnson JL; Shaw PB
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 12908866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound attenuation of TDH-39 earphones in a diffuse field of narrow-band noise.
    Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jan; 79(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 3944342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of earplug attenuation under supra-aural and circumaural headphones.
    Tufts JB; Palmer JV; Marshall L
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Oct; 51(10):730-8. PubMed ID: 22998413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors.
    Lempert BL; Edwards RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):894-902. PubMed ID: 6660189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise attenuation characteristics of the MX-41/AR and the Telephonics circumaural audiometric headsets.
    Bienvenue GR; Michael PL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 721665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.