These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8328381)

  • 41. A review of impedance cardiography.
    Jensen L; Yakimets J; Teo KK
    Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 7622392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Transthoracic electrical bioimpedence cardiac output: comparison with multigated equillibrium radionuclide cardiography.
    Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Bhandopadhyaya A; Sathyaprabha TN; Janaki P; Mahalla BK; Gupta R; Banakal S; Jairaj PS
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 20229061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [The reproducibility of stroke-volume measurements by impedance cardiography. A critical analysis (author's transl)].
    Stick C
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Dec; 67(12):863-7. PubMed ID: 735295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of band and spot electrodes for the measurement of stroke volume by the bioelectric impedance technique.
    Gotshall RW; Sexson WR
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Mar; 22(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 8124992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Noninvasive monitoring of transient cardiac changes with impedance cardiography.
    Zhang H; Li JK
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2008 Dec; 8(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 19130223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
    Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
    Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Impedance cardiography (author's transl)].
    Knapp E
    Wien Klin Wochenschr Suppl; 1976; 58():1-15. PubMed ID: 1069405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Influence of ventriculoatrial conduction on hemodynamic consequences in patients with artificial pacing].
    Abe Y; Kadowaki K; Sato T; Atsumi H; Kumagai T; Sudo H; Kousokabe H; Kanazawa T
    J Cardiol; 1990; 20(3):727-35. PubMed ID: 2131361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of impedance cardiographic measurements using band and spot electrodes.
    Sherwood A; Royal SA; Hutcheson JS; Turner JR
    Psychophysiology; 1992 Nov; 29(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 1461960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Comparison of cardiac output between in DDD and in VVI by pulsed Doppler echocardiographic method (correction with Swan-Ganz catheter method)].
    Shigemura M; Sawada K; Hasegawa H; Kobayashi F; Izumi S; Suzuki T; Shimizu M; Naganawa E
    Kokyu To Junkan; 1990 Nov; 38(11):1091-5. PubMed ID: 2263768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reproducibility of haemodynamic measurements by impedance cardiography.
    Veigl VL; Judy WV
    Cardiovasc Res; 1983 Dec; 17(12):728-34. PubMed ID: 6661744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Determination of cardiac output using ensemble-averaged impedance cardiograms.
    Muzi M; Ebert TJ; Tristani FE; Jeutter DC; Barney JA; Smith JJ
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1985 Jan; 58(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 3968011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography.
    Daralammouri Y; Ayoub K; Badrieh N; Lauer B
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Jan; 16():19. PubMed ID: 26800673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive technique for atrioventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Braun MU; Schnabel A; Rauwolf T; Schulze M; Strasser RH
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 13(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 16177849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of left lateral position on cardiac output changes after head up tilt measured by impedance cardiography.
    Kamenik M
    J Clin Monit Comput; 1999 Dec; 15(7-8):519-23. PubMed ID: 12578050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution.
    Jewkes C; Sear JW; Verhoeff F; Sanders DJ; Foëx P
    Br J Anaesth; 1991 Dec; 67(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 1768552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of a method utilizing PhysioFlow®, a novel signal morphology-based form of impedance cardiography, to measure cardiac output in the conscious beagle.
    Payseur JD; Rigney JJ; Turner SL; Wu X; Murphy DJ; Rossman EI
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2016; 81():115-9. PubMed ID: 27050559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Advances in continuous, noninvasive hemodynamic surveillance. Impedance cardiography.
    Von Rueden KT; Turner MA
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 11(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 10373824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Transthoracic impedance compared to magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of cardiac output.
    Villacorta Junior H; Villacorta AS; Amador F; Hadlich M; Albuquerque DC; Azevedo CF
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 99(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 23152290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Computer supported analysis of cardiovascular parameters by impedance cardiography and plethysmography.
    Hunold S; Hexamer M; Werner J; Gehrt M
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 8107666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.