119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8328590)
1. Conservatorship and the severely mentally ill.
Zibin T; Hunks D
Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Aug; 150(8):1278. PubMed ID: 8328590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation].
Thiel A; Röttgers HR
Psychiatr Prax; 2006 May; 33(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 16680628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conservatorship for gravely disabled psychiatric patients: a four-year follow-up study.
Lamb HR; Weinberger LE
Am J Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 149(7):909-13. PubMed ID: 1609870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conservatorship for the chronically mentally ill: review and case series.
Frank JB; Degan D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1997; 20(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 9130017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Competency.
Zibin T; Nolet C
Can J Psychiatry; 1996 Dec; 41(10):666-7. PubMed ID: 8978947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guardianship for the severely mentally ill.
Melamed Y; Kimchi R; Barak Y
Med Law; 2000; 19(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 10994217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Nexum: a modest proposal for self-guardianship by contract: a system of advance directives and surrogate committees-at-large for the intermittently mentally ill.
Stavis PF
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 16(1):1-95. PubMed ID: 10695246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Revising the substituted judgment standard.
Baergen R
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 7632994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Balancing autonomy and risk: a failure of nerve in England and Wales?
Richardson G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 17141872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [What is a "Considerable Damage to One's Health" in the Sense of German Guardianship Law?].
Steinert T; Heinz A; Hohl-Radke F; Koller M; Müller J; Müller S; Zinkler M
Psychiatr Prax; 2016 Oct; 43(7):395-399. PubMed ID: 27733009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Substituted decision making: elder guardianship.
Leatherman ME; Goethe KE
J Psychiatr Pract; 2009 Nov; 15(6):470-6. PubMed ID: 19934723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ECHR 2012/10 Case of D.D. v. Lithuania, 14 February 2012, no. 13469/06 (Second Section).
Dute J
Eur J Health Law; 2012 Jun; 19(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 22916538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ECHR 2012/8 Case of Stanev v. Bulgaria, 17 January 2012, no. 36760/06 (Grand Chamber).
Dute J
Eur J Health Law; 2012 Jun; 19(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 22916536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Substitute decision-making and the substitute decision-maker.
Kline SA
Health Law Can; 1992; 13(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 10121311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Medical treatment of mentally incompetent patients in the Law on Medical Treatment Agreement].
van Delden JJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Dec; 138(50):2510-3. PubMed ID: 7800079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Unnoticed incapacity, illusory rights. R (on the application of MH) v. Secretary of State for Health.
Scott-Moncrieff L
Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(2):238-52. PubMed ID: 16831823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Thiel A, Röttgers H.R. Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation. Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 196-201].
Dreyer J
Psychiatr Prax; 2006 Sep; 33(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 16944443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Guardianship law in routine nursing care. Determining mental competence].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2013 Apr; 66(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 23634553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The bane of surrogate decision-making: defining the best interests of never-competent persons.
Cantor NL
J Leg Med; 2005 Jun; 26(2):155-205. PubMed ID: 16036812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Involuntary placement and coercive treatment in Germany. Subtle differences within the legal framework].
Falkenbach M; Jäger M; Neumann NU; Frasch K
Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Mar; 36(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18726843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
