These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8329101)

  • 1. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance.
    Albrektsson T; Zarb GA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 8329101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged endosseous implants resulting in crestal bone loss: a clinical evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery.
    Tal H; Artzi Z; Moses O; Nemcovsky CE; Kozlovsky A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 11515998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coated endosseous dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Biesbrock AR; Edgerton M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 8530174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
    Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone quality and the immediate loading of implants-critical aspects based on literature, research, and clinical experience.
    Romanos GE
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 19509530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
    Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis.
    Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 8752556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current trends in implantology: Part 1--Biological response, implant stability, and implant design.
    Saadoun AP; Le Gall MG; Touati B
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 16(7):529-35; quiz 536, 521. PubMed ID: 15485167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
    Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone.
    Isidor F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():8-18. PubMed ID: 16968378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of early exposure on the integration of dental implants: Part 2--Clinical findings at 6 months postloading.
    Holt R; Vernino AR; Lee HM; Severson S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Aug; 21(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 11519709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
    Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of allogeneic, freeze-dried, demineralized bone matrix on guided bone regeneration in supra-alveolar peri-implant defects in dogs.
    Caplanis N; Sigurdsson TJ; Rohrer MD; Wikesjö UM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 9337024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature.
    Sennerby L; Roos J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):408-20. PubMed ID: 9922733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct bone anchorage of oral implants: clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration.
    Albrektsson T; Sennerby L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 2372366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Keys to success in implant osseointegration].
    Saadoun AP; Le Gall M
    Int J Dent Symp; 1994; 2(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9117856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary stability and osseointegration: preliminary clinical results with a tapered diminishing-thread implant.
    Abbou M
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 15(2):161-8; quiz 170. PubMed ID: 12772634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current trends in immediate osseous dental implant case selection criteria.
    McNutt MD; Chou CH
    J Dent Educ; 2003 Aug; 67(8):850-9. PubMed ID: 12959158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
    Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histologic evaluation of osseointegrated implants restored in nonaxial functional occlusion with preangled abutments.
    Celletti R; Pameijer CH; Bracchetti G; Donath K; Persichetti G; Visani I
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Dec; 15(6):562-73. PubMed ID: 9601254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.