394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8329161)
1. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations.
Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 8054183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
Oilo G; Um CM
Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
Shortall AC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
Mason PN; Ferrari M
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch adhesive system.
Bedran-de-Castro AK; Pereira PN; Pimenta LA; Thompson JY
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 15088725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
Futatsuki M; Nakata M
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro microleakage associated with posterior composite restorations used with different base/bonding system combinations.
Youngson CC; Grey NJ; Jones JG; Redfern E
Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 1814770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Debonding of adhesively restored deep Class II MOD restorations after functional loading.
Ausiello P; Davidson CL; Cascone P; DeGee AJ; Rengo S
Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 10477988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
