57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8329590)
1. Application of Gabor transform as texture discriminator of masses in digital mammograms.
Kaewlium A; Longbotham H
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1993; 29():183-90. PubMed ID: 8329590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectral phase based medical image processing.
Kothapalli SR; Yelleswarapu CS; Naraharisetty SG; Wu P; Rao DV
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):708-21. PubMed ID: 15935969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets.
Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Frère AF
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Sep; 20(9):953-64. PubMed ID: 11585211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction to "Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms using Gabor filters, phase portraits, fractal dimension, and texture analysis [1]".
Banik S; Rangayyan RM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Jul; 5(4):421-3. PubMed ID: 20232262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Texture discrimination by Gabor functions.
Turner MR
Biol Cybern; 1986; 55(2-3):71-82. PubMed ID: 3801538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 20851789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Digital mammography is very useful in mass screening of breast cancer].
Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; van Erning LJ; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(49):2383-7. PubMed ID: 2263263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms.
De Maeseneer M; Beeckman P; Osteaux M; Mattheus R; Hoste M; Bastaerts Y; Jong B
J Belge Radiol; 1992 Jun; 75(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1400145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precancerous Change Detection Technique on Mammography Breast Cancer Images based on Mean Ratio and Log Ratio using Fuzzy c Mean Classification with Gabor Filter.
Jamil R; Dong M; Bano S; Javed A; Abdullah M
Curr Med Imaging; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38803183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The application of computerized color composition technique on X-ray mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
Yuan YX
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1990 Nov; 28(11):662-4, 702. PubMed ID: 2086070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography goes digital.
Health News; 2001 Feb; 7(2):4. PubMed ID: 11232117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Signal-tuned Gabor functions as models for stimulus-dependent cortical receptive fields.
Torreão JR; Victer SM; Amaral MS
Neural Comput; 2014 May; 26(5):920-52. PubMed ID: 24555452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial and spatial-frequency analysis in visual optics.
Westheimer G
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Jul; 32(4):271-81. PubMed ID: 22697214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
