These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8329590)

  • 1. Application of Gabor transform as texture discriminator of masses in digital mammograms.
    Kaewlium A; Longbotham H
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1993; 29():183-90. PubMed ID: 8329590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral phase based medical image processing.
    Kothapalli SR; Yelleswarapu CS; Naraharisetty SG; Wu P; Rao DV
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):708-21. PubMed ID: 15935969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Sep; 20(9):953-64. PubMed ID: 11585211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correction to "Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms using Gabor filters, phase portraits, fractal dimension, and texture analysis [1]".
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Jul; 5(4):421-3. PubMed ID: 20232262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Texture discrimination by Gabor functions.
    Turner MR
    Biol Cybern; 1986; 55(2-3):71-82. PubMed ID: 3801538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 20851789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Digital mammography is very useful in mass screening of breast cancer].
    Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; van Erning LJ; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(49):2383-7. PubMed ID: 2263263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms.
    De Maeseneer M; Beeckman P; Osteaux M; Mattheus R; Hoste M; Bastaerts Y; Jong B
    J Belge Radiol; 1992 Jun; 75(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1400145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
    Vadivel A; Surendiran B
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The application of computerized color composition technique on X-ray mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Yuan YX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1990 Nov; 28(11):662-4, 702. PubMed ID: 2086070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography goes digital.
    Health News; 2001 Feb; 7(2):4. PubMed ID: 11232117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
    Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal-tuned Gabor functions as models for stimulus-dependent cortical receptive fields.
    Torreão JR; Victer SM; Amaral MS
    Neural Comput; 2014 May; 26(5):920-52. PubMed ID: 24555452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial and spatial-frequency analysis in visual optics.
    Westheimer G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Jul; 32(4):271-81. PubMed ID: 22697214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral 'noise' and ultrasonic tissue characterization.
    Giunta G
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1992; 4(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 1419920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.