These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 833001)

  • 1. Experience with a microscopic screening program for sputum specimens.
    Porschen RK
    Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 833001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presence of alveolar macrophages as a criterion for determining the suitability of sputum specimens for bacterial culture.
    Courcol RJ; Damien JM; Ramon P; Voisin C; Martin GR
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Apr; 3(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 6373252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.
    Murray PR; Washington JA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1975 Jun; 50(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1127999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quantitative determination in the culture examination of the sputum].
    Bovelacci A; Montini G; Ramacciotti PG
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Jun; 20(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 6396676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bacteriological examination of the sputum in support of a rational antibiotic therapy of bronchopulmonary infections].
    Buiuc D; Burcoveanu C
    Rev Ig Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol Pneumoftiziol Pneumoftiziol; 1982; 31(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 6294808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical microbiological study of sputum and aspirates from larynx or trachea. An evaluation of exact criteria for assessment by direct microscopy].
    Schønheyder HC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Sep; 156(39):5703-7. PubMed ID: 7985258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indicators of bacterial infection in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis for application in clinical trials of antibacterial drugs.
    Burley CJ; Masterton RG; Lovell DP
    J Infect; 2007 Sep; 55(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 17640738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of 5 selection criteria for sputum as a valid sample for culture].
    Martín JE; Catalán P; Expósito C; Pérez MT; Domínguez J; Bisquert J
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1991 Dec; 9(10):603-7. PubMed ID: 1822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
    Suzuki K; Higuchi T
    Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mycobacterial tests].
    Takashima T; Higuchi T
    Kekkaku; 2008 Jan; 83(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 18283915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of overnight refrigeration on the microscopic evaluation of sputum.
    Penn RL; Silberman R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Feb; 19(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 6699145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening of sputum: an experience in a tertiary care hospital.
    Sood S; Kapil A; Chandra M; Pandey A; Das BK
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Oct; 47(10):985-6. PubMed ID: 10778693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Dibutyl Phthalate (CAS No. 84-74-2) Administered in Feed to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.
    Marsman D
    Toxic Rep Ser; 1995 Apr; 30():1-G5. PubMed ID: 12209194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microscopic Analysis and Quality Assessment of Induced Sputum From Children With Pneumonia in the PERCH Study.
    Murdoch DR; Morpeth SC; Hammitt LL; Driscoll AJ; Watson NL; Baggett HC; Brooks WA; Deloria Knoll M; Feikin DR; Kotloff KL; Levine OS; Madhi SA; O'Brien KL; Scott JAG; Thea DM; Ahmed D; Awori JO; DeLuca AN; Ebruke BE; Higdon MM; Jorakate P; Karron RA; Kazungu S; Kwenda G; Hossain L; Makprasert S; Moore DP; Mudau A; Mwaba J; Panchalingam S; Park DE; Prosperi C; Salaudeen R; Toure A; Zeger SL; Howie SRC;
    Clin Infect Dis; 2017 Jun; 64(suppl_3):S271-S279. PubMed ID: 28575360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy.
    Smith P; Morris A; Reller LB
    Pathology; 2003 Apr; 35(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 12745465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judging respiratory specimen acceptability for AFB microscopy: visual vs. microscopic screening.
    Khan MS; Dar O; Tahseen S; Godfrey-Faussett P
    Trop Med Int Health; 2009 May; 14(5):571-5. PubMed ID: 19298638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiologic evaluation of canine urine: direct microscopic examination and preservation of specimen quality for culture.
    Allen TA; Jones RL; Purvance J
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1987 May; 190(10):1289-91. PubMed ID: 3294768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of storage and postage on recovery and quantitation of bacteria in sputum samples.
    Pye A; Hill SL; Bharadwa P; Stockley RA
    J Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17893120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases; features and limitations of the microscopic examination of clinical specimens].
    Misawa S
    Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 1999 Dec; 10(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 10866501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of six different criteria for judging the acceptability of sputum specimens.
    Wong LK; Barry AL; Horgan SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):627-31. PubMed ID: 7153311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.