These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8330375)

  • 1. Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.
    Zhou X; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Afework Y; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Aug; 73(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 8330375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs.
    Zhou XH; Knisley SB; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1991 Jun; 68(6):1761-7. PubMed ID: 2036724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.
    Zhou X; Daubert JP; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):145-60. PubMed ID: 8417837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation at very high and very low energies: a comparison with monophasic waveforms in an animal model of ventricular fibrillation.
    Clark CB; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Karlsson G; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2002 Aug; 54(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 12161298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External exponential biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform: efficacy in ventricular fibrillation of longer duration.
    Yamanouchi Y; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Mowrey KA; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1481-7. PubMed ID: 10588150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation.
    Ayers GM; Alferness CA; Ilina M; Wagner DO; Sirokman WA; Adams JM; Griffin JC
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):413-22. PubMed ID: 8281677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy.
    Behrens S; Li C; Kirchhof P; Fabritz FL; Franz MR
    Circulation; 1996 Oct; 94(8):1974-80. PubMed ID: 8873676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response of relatively refractory canine myocardium to monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Daubert JP; Frazier DW; Wolf PD; Franz MR; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1991 Dec; 84(6):2522-38. PubMed ID: 1959202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pediatric transthoracic defibrillation: biphasic versus monophasic waveforms in an experimental model.
    Clark CB; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Karlsson G; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2001 Nov; 51(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 11718971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.
    Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Yamaguchi H; Povoas HP; Pernat AM; Bisera J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 34(3):815-22. PubMed ID: 10483965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks.
    Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN
    Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refractory interval after transcardiac shocks during ventricular fibrillation.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Circulation; 1996 Dec; 94(11):2947-52. PubMed ID: 8941125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open-chest epicardial "surgical" defibrillation: biphasic versus monophasic waveform shocks.
    Zhang Y; Davies LR; Coddington WJ; Zimmerman MB; Wuthrich S; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Mar; 26(3):711-8. PubMed ID: 12698671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Threshold reduction with biphasic defibrillator waveforms. Role of charge balance.
    Jones JL; Tovar OH
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():25-30. PubMed ID: 8656123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and a preceding unsuccessful shock on the probability of defibrillation success using biphasic waveforms in pigs.
    Windecker S; Kay GN; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 8(12):1386-95. PubMed ID: 9436776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model.
    Niemann JT; Burian D; Garner D; Lewis RJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Sep; 36(3):932-8. PubMed ID: 10987622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation.
    Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Povoas HP; Klouche K; Kamohara T; Bisera J
    Chest; 2001 Sep; 120(3):948-54. PubMed ID: 11555534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transthoracic monophasic and biphasic defibrillation in a swine model: a comparison of efficacy, ST segment changes, and postshock hemodynamics.
    Niemann JT; Burian D; Garner D; Lewis RJ
    Resuscitation; 2000 Sep; 47(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11004381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.