These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8330407)

  • 1. The history of evaluation criteria for CAP surveys.
    Hamlin WB
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1456-7; discussion 1458-60. PubMed ID: 8330407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proficiency testing as a regulatory device: a CAP perspective.
    Hamlin W
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1234-6; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The College of American Pathologists, 1946-1996: laboratory standards.
    Wagner LR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 May; 121(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 9167614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The College of American Pathologists, 1946-1996: laboratory accreditation.
    Hamlin WB; Duckworth JK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jul; 121(7):745-53. PubMed ID: 9240914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory. 1950.
    Levey S; Jennings ER
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):791-8; discussion 799-803. PubMed ID: 1497455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The history of proficiency testing/quality control.
    Sunderman FW
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1205-9; discussion 1218-25. PubMed ID: 1623584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voluntary professional programs for the evaluation and accreditation of clinical laboratories in the United States.
    Eilers RJ
    Med Instrum; 1974; 8(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 4812343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intralaboratory performance requirements necessary to pass proficiency testing: CAP-1990 vs CLIA-1967 (March 14, 1990) formats compared.
    Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS; Leinweber JE
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jun; 38(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 1597015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twenty-five years of proficiency testing for clinical laboratories.
    Sunderman FW
    Ann Clin Lab Sci (1971); 1972; 2(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 4563231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accreditation of medical laboratories in The Netherlands.
    Slagter S; Loeber JG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 Jul; 309(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 11438294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of external quality assurance schemes in assessing and improving quality in medical laboratories.
    Libeer JC
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 Jul; 309(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 11438297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additional Essential Criteria for Quality Systems of Medical Laboratories. European Community Confederation of Clinical Chemistry (EC4) Working Group on Harmonisation of Quality Systems and Accreditation.
    Jansen RT; Blaton V; Burnett D; Huisman W; Queraltó JM; Zérah S; Allman B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 36(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 9638352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European Communities Confederation of Clinical Chemistry Working Group on Accreditation: past, present and future.
    Huisman W
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 Jul; 309(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 11438288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Accreditation of French medical laboratories].
    Sachs C; Zerah S
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1998; 56(5):612-3. PubMed ID: 9769499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ISO and CEN documents on quality in medical laboratories.
    Kenny D
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 Jul; 309(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11438290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How good are clinical laboratories? An assessment of current performance.
    Rej R; Jenny RW
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1210-7; discussion 1218-25. PubMed ID: 1623585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Verifying performance characteristics of quantitative analytical systems: calibration verification, linearity, and analytical measurement range.
    Killeen AA; Long T; Souers R; Styer P; Ventura CB; Klee GG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Sep; 138(9):1173-81. PubMed ID: 25171699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy verification and identification of matrix effects. The College of American Pathologists' Protocol.
    Eckfeldt JH; Copeland KR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 8466401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accreditation of medical laboratories. Some reflections from the Nordic Horizon.
    Kallner A
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 Jul; 309(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 11438295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.