These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8330408)

  • 1. Governmental perspectives on evaluating laboratory performance.
    Boone DJ
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1461-5; discussion 1466-7. PubMed ID: 8330408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating laboratory performance. Historical and governmental perspectives.
    Boone DJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 3355332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How good are clinical laboratories? An assessment of current performance.
    Rej R; Jenny RW
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1210-7; discussion 1218-25. PubMed ID: 1623585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medically relevant laboratory-performance goals: a listing of the complexities and a call for action.
    Witte DL
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1530-5. PubMed ID: 8330415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cholesterol operational process specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Wiebe DA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1938-44. PubMed ID: 1934469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cholesterol--a model system to relate medical needs with analytical performance.
    Wiebe DA; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1504-12; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 8330412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proficiency testing from a total quality management perspective.
    Castañeda-Méndez K
    Clin Chem; 1992 May; 38(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 1582009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of Pre-analytical Process with Quality Indicators and Six Sigma Methodology in the Parasitology Laboratory of a Tertiary Healthcare Center].
    Zorbozan O; Zorbozan N; Turgay N
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2019 Jul; 53(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 31414633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical relevance of laboratory tests. A clinical perspective.
    Watts NB
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):379-82. PubMed ID: 3355337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presentation and formatting of laboratory results: a narrative review on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group "postanalytical phase" (WG-POST).
    Cadamuro J; Hillarp A; Unger A; von Meyer A; Bauçà JM; Plekhanova O; Linko-Parvinen A; Watine J; Leichtle A; Buchta C; Haschke-Becher E; Eisl C; Winzer J; Kristoffersen AH
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2021 Aug; 58(5):329-353. PubMed ID: 33538219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytical goals developed from the inherent error of medical tests.
    Ross JW; Fraser MD
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1481-93; discussion 1493-4. PubMed ID: 8330410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proficiency testing in a medical-needs context.
    Lott JA; Manning NR; Kyler MK
    Clin Chem; 1989 Mar; 35(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 2646032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Charts of operational process specifications ("OPSpecs charts") for assessing the precision, accuracy, and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1226-33; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical need for quality specifications--a NORDKEM project for selecting the appropriate quality in clinical laboratories.
    de Verdier CH; Groth T; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 215():29-37. PubMed ID: 8327849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency.
    Plebani M; Carraro P
    Clin Chem; 1997 Aug; 43(8 Pt 1):1348-51. PubMed ID: 9267312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proficiency testing linked to the national reference system for the clinical laboratory: a proposal for achieving accuracy.
    Lasky FD
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1260-7; discussion 1268-72. PubMed ID: 1623591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory error undetectable by customary quality control/quality assurance monitors.
    Kazmierczak SC; Catrou PG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jul; 117(7):714-8. PubMed ID: 8323436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Problems in practical implementation of the external quality control program in clinical laboratory investigations].
    Zaikin EV; Malakhov VN; Garanina EN; Delektorskaia LN
    Klin Lab Diagn; 1995; (4):11-5. PubMed ID: 7670810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of actual proficiency-testing performance under CLIA '67 (March 14, 1990) rules: perspective from the first year's data.
    Lanphear BJ; Burmeister BJ; Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH; Hassemer DJ
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1254-9; discussion 1268-72. PubMed ID: 1623590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.