These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8330410)

  • 21. Estimating total analytical error and its sources. Techniques to improve method evaluation.
    Krouwer JS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):726-31. PubMed ID: 1497445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analytical quality goals-a review.
    Flatland B; Camus MS; Baral RM
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2018 Dec; 47(4):527-538. PubMed ID: 30152856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selection of medically useful quality-control procedures for individual tests done in a multitest analytical system.
    Koch DD; Oryall JJ; Quam EF; Feldbruegge DH; Dowd DE; Barry PL; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1990 Feb; 36(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 2302766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance goals for the laboratory testing of antithrombin, protein C and protein S.
    Meijer P; Haverkate F; Kluft C
    Thromb Haemost; 2006 Nov; 96(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17080214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Choosing quality-control systems to detect maximum clinically allowable analytical errors.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1989 Feb; 35(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 2914374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The evolution and limitations of accuracy and precision standards.
    Doumas BT
    Clin Chim Acta; 1997 Apr; 260(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 9177910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proficiency testing in a medical-needs context.
    Lott JA; Manning NR; Kyler MK
    Clin Chem; 1989 Mar; 35(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 2646032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proficiency testing performance: a case study with modeling.
    Waugh JM; Collier CP; Day AG; Waugh M; Raymond MJ
    Clin Biochem; 2002 Sep; 35(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 12413605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating test methods by estimating total error.
    Chinchilli VM; Miller WG
    Clin Chem; 1994 Mar; 40(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 8131284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Error models and quality control performance.
    Chiecchio A; Malvano R
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 May; 34(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 8790978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 1547553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standardization of Urine Albumin Measurements: Status and Performance Goals.
    Miller WG; Seegmiller JC; Lieske JC; Narva AS; Bachmann LM
    J Appl Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 2(3):423-429. PubMed ID: 33636850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of 20 clinical chemistry and 12 immunoassay analytes in terms of total analytical error and measurement uncertainty.
    Balık AR; Gücel F
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2021 Nov; 81(7):517-522. PubMed ID: 34314276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Irregular analytical errors in diagnostic testing - a novel concept.
    Vogeser M; Seger C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Feb; 56(3):386-396. PubMed ID: 28902615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
    Fraser CG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cholesterol--a model system to relate medical needs with analytical performance.
    Wiebe DA; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1504-12; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 8330412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680.
    Tran MT; Hoang K; Greaves RF
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 27527571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance criteria for testosterone measurements based on biological variation in adult males: recommendations from the Partnership for the Accurate Testing of Hormones.
    Yun YM; Botelho JC; Chandler DW; Katayev A; Roberts WL; Stanczyk FZ; Vesper HW; Nakamoto JM; Garibaldi L; Clarke NJ; Fitzgerald RL
    Clin Chem; 2012 Dec; 58(12):1703-10. PubMed ID: 23065474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.