260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8331236)
1. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study.
Choi SH; Kim SH; Choi HJ; Park BK; Lee HJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 15480035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.
Oellinger JJ; Blohmer JU; Michniewicz K; Siewert C; Wust P; Gutberlet M; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 10721187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early-stage cervical cancer.
Zhang W; Zhang J; Yang J; Xue H; Cao D; Huang H; Wu M; Cui Q; Chen J; Lang J; Shen K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1292-8. PubMed ID: 24987919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging performs better than endocervical curettage for preoperative prediction of cervical stromal invasion in endometrial carcinomas.
Haldorsen IS; Berg A; Werner HM; Magnussen IJ; Helland H; Salvesen OO; Trovik J; Salvesen HB
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 22609110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine cervical carcinoma: preoperative staging with 3.0-T MR imaging--comparison with 1.5-T MR imaging.
Hori M; Kim T; Murakami T; Imaoka I; Onishi H; Tomoda K; Tsutsui T; Enomoto T; Kimura T; Nakamura H
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 19221059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early-stage cervical carcinoma: the role of multidetector CT in correlation with histopathological findings.
Tsili AC; Tsangou V; Koliopoulos G; Stefos T; Argyropoulou MI
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Nov; 33(8):882-7. PubMed ID: 24219735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1828-33. PubMed ID: 11511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive value of computerized tomography in the presurgical evaluation of primary carcinoma of the cervix.
Camilien L; Gordon D; Fruchter RG; Maiman M; Boyce JG
Gynecol Oncol; 1988 Jun; 30(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 3371746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
