These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8331318)

  • 21. Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning.
    Van Hedger SC; Heald SL; Koch R; Nusbaum HC
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():95-110. PubMed ID: 25909580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners.
    Shen J; Souza PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Sep; 146(3):EL232. PubMed ID: 31590538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ups and Downs in Auditory Development: Preschoolers' Sensitivity to Pitch Contour and Timbre.
    Creel SC
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Mar; 40(2):373-403. PubMed ID: 25846115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relating binaural pitch perception to the individual listener's auditory profile.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2968-86. PubMed ID: 22501074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developmental changes in infants' sensitivity to octave-band noises.
    Trehub SE; Schneider BA; Endman M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1980 Apr; 29(2):282-93. PubMed ID: 7365426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binaural and temporal integration of the loudness of tones and noises.
    Algom D; Rubin A; Cohen-Raz L
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 2762103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preparation of stimuli for timbre perception studies.
    Labuschagne IB; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2256-67. PubMed ID: 23967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory demonstrations on compact disk for large N.
    Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 8423255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pitch and loudness interact in auditory displays: can the data get lost in the map?
    Neuhoff JG; Kramer G; Wayand J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 12009173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fractal structure enables temporal prediction in music.
    Rankin SK; Fink PW; Large EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):EL256-62. PubMed ID: 25324107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness.
    Clément S; Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2805-11. PubMed ID: 10573896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual distortions in pitch and time reveal active prediction and support for an auditory pitch-motion hypothesis.
    Henry MJ; McAuley JD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e70646. PubMed ID: 23936462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness.
    Melara RD; Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 2385491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pitch-induced responses in the right auditory cortex correlate with musical ability in normal listeners.
    Puschmann S; Özyurt J; Uppenkamp S; Thiel CM
    Neuroreport; 2013 Oct; 24(15):841-5. PubMed ID: 23995293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: cognitive and perceptual factors.
    Rammsayer TH; Lima SD
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):565-74. PubMed ID: 1780204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response bias in category and magnitude estimation of difference and similarity for loudness and pitch.
    Schneider B; Parker S; Valenti M; Farrell G; Kanow G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Aug; 4(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.
    Joshi SN; Wróblewski M; Schmid KK; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 26827032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.