304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8331918)
1. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
Dillon H
J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
Pascoe DP
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40. PubMed ID: 1180471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.
Silman S; Silverman CA; Emmer MB; Gelfand SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
Kiessling J; Steffens T
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
Reber MB; Kompis M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect on the speech reception threshold in noise of the recovery time of the compressor in the high-frequency channel of a two-channel aid.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():82-91. PubMed ID: 8153569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
