These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8332420)

  • 1. Cortical involvement in visual scan in the monkey.
    Bolster RB; Pribram KH
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):505-18. PubMed ID: 8332420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship of visual evoked potentials to cortical physiology.
    Nakayama K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():21-36. PubMed ID: 6807172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of the inferotemporal cortex in visual selective attention.
    Nuwer MR; Pribram KH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Apr; 46(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 85535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occipital and inferotemporal responses to visual signals in the monkey.
    Ashford JW; Fuster JM
    Exp Neurol; 1985 Nov; 90(2):444-66. PubMed ID: 4054294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferotemporal evoked potentials after visual discrimination training in squirrel monkey.
    Carran AB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):851-4. PubMed ID: 4634142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impairment in sampling visual stimuli in monkeys with inferotemporal lesions.
    Butter CM; Hirtzel M
    Physiol Behav; 1970 Mar; 5(3):369-70. PubMed ID: 5004627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inversion of pop-out for a distracting feature dimension in monkey visual cortex.
    Klink PC; Teeuwen RRM; Lorteije JAM; Roelfsema PR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Feb; 120(9):e2210839120. PubMed ID: 36812207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcranial random-noise stimulation of visual cortex potentiates value-driven attentional capture.
    van Koningsbruggen MG; Ficarella SC; Battelli L; Hickey C
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 11(9):1481-8. PubMed ID: 27107297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1.
    Lamme VA; Zipser K; Spekreijse H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1044-53. PubMed ID: 12419127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual sensitivity.
    Brown JL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1973; 24():151-86. PubMed ID: 4198917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further analysis of visual discrimination deficits following foveal prestriate and inferotemporal lesions in rhesus monkeys.
    Gross CG; Cowey A; Manning FJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Jul; 76(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 4997738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restricted posterior parietal lesions in the rhesus monkey and performance on visuospatial tasks.
    Petrides M; Iversen SD
    Brain Res; 1979 Jan; 161(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 103604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal involvement of visual area MT in global feature-based enhancement but not contingent attentional capture.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():90-102. PubMed ID: 26067347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual cortex ablation and thresholds for successively presented stimuli in rhesus monkeys: I. Orientation.
    Dean P
    Exp Brain Res; 1978 Aug; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 99326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parietal blood oxygenation level-dependent response evoked by covert visual search reflects set-size effect in monkeys.
    Atabaki A; Marciniak K; Dicke PW; Karnath HO; Thier P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 39(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 24279771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.
    Huber-Huber C; Grubert A; Ansorge U; Eimer M
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2210-9. PubMed ID: 25589587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chronically implanted epidural electrodes in Göttinger minipigs allow function tests of epiretinal implants.
    Laube T; Schanze T; Brockmann C; Bolle I; Stieglitz T; Bornfeld N
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 241(12):1013-9. PubMed ID: 14605905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responsiveness of inferotemporal single units to visual pattern stimuli in monkeys performing discrimination.
    Sato T; Kawamura T; Iwai E
    Exp Brain Res; 1980 Feb; 38(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 6768577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.