These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8332424)

  • 1. Long-term training, transfer, and retention in learning to lipread.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Gesi AT
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):549-62. PubMed ID: 8332424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discovery and expository methods in teaching visual consonant and word identification.
    Gesi AT; Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1180-8. PubMed ID: 1447928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-linguistic comparisons in the integration of visual and auditory speech.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Smeele PM
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 7885260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. During Lipreading Training With Sentence Stimuli, Feedback Controls Learning and Generalization to Audiovisual Speech in Noise.
    Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 34965362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual intelligibility of consonants: a lipreading screening test with implications for aural rehabilitation.
    Binnie CA; Jackson PL; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Nov; 41(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 994484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of age and gender on lipreading abilities.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007; 18(10):883-92. PubMed ID: 18496997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments.
    Braida LD
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):647-77. PubMed ID: 1775661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking visual and kinesthetic imagery in lipreading instruction.
    De Felippo CL; Sims DG; Gottermeier L
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):244-56. PubMed ID: 7731215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceiving speech from inverted faces.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):1047-65. PubMed ID: 8920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similarity ratings and confusability of lipread consonants compared with similarity ratings of auditory and orthographic stimuli.
    Manning SK; Shofner E
    Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(4):587-604. PubMed ID: 1793128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience with a talker can transfer across modalities to facilitate lipreading.
    Sanchez K; Dias JW; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1359-65. PubMed ID: 23955059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of consonantal context on vowel lipreading.
    Montgomery AA; Walden BE; Prosek RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 3560899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate memory in the orally trained deaf: effects of 'lipreadability' in the recall of written syllables.
    Campbell R; Wright H
    Br J Psychol; 1989 Aug; 80 ( Pt 3)():299-312. PubMed ID: 2790390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual phonemic ambiguity and speechreading.
    Lidestam B; Beskow J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):835-47. PubMed ID: 16908878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: further experiments with inexperienced observers.
    Reed CM; Doherty MJ; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 7120961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech.
    De Filippo CL; Scott BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Apr; 63(4):1186-92. PubMed ID: 649877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.