These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8332425)

  • 1. Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: an evaluative review.
    Van Zandt T; Townsend JT
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):563-80. PubMed ID: 8332425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parallel, exhaustive processing underlies logarithmic search functions: Visual search with cortical magnification.
    Wang Z; Lleras A; Buetti S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1343-1350. PubMed ID: 29667125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.
    Woodman GF; Vogel EK; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 May; 12(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 11437304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An exemplar-familiarity model predicts short-term and long-term probe recognition across diverse forms of memory search.
    Nosofsky RM; Cox GE; Cao R; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1524-39. PubMed ID: 24749963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.
    Wolfe JM; Palmer EM; Horowitz TS
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19895828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial, self-terminating search can be distinguished from others: Evidence from multi-target search data.
    Lee J; Jung K; Han SW
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104736. PubMed ID: 33887651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations.
    Marini F; Scott J; Aron AR; Ester EF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28439791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and guided visual search: the role of visual working memory.
    Hahn S; Buttaccio DR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 Jul; 25(4):535-549. PubMed ID: 29770738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does constraining memory maintenance reduce visual search efficiency?
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Thomas RP; Dougherty MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):605-621. PubMed ID: 27967335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual search does not remain efficient when executive working memory is working.
    Han SH; Kim MS
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):623-8. PubMed ID: 15327634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To quit or not to quit in dynamic search.
    Shi Z; Allenmark F; Zhu X; Elliott MA; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):799-817. PubMed ID: 31468326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Selective attention and schizophrenia before the administration of neuroleptics].
    Lussier I; Stip E
    Encephale; 1999; 25(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 10668600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time estimation and concurrent nontemporal processing: specific interference from short-term-memory demands.
    Fortin C; Rousseau R; Bourque P; Kirouac E
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):536-48. PubMed ID: 8332423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search.
    Maljkovic V; Martini P
    Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2831-46. PubMed ID: 16023172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
    Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.