These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8333886)

  • 1. [Value of in situ measurement for evaluating effective hearing aid amplification at high sound pressure levels].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Jun; 72(6):301-5. PubMed ID: 8333886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [New aspects of hearing aid fitting].
    Schorn K; Brügel FJ
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jan; 73(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8141956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [What improvements can be gained by additional boring in hearing aid fitting?].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Hofer R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Feb; 71(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1571059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [In situ measurements for determining the effect of additional boring of the earmold].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Stecker M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Jun; 69(6):337-40. PubMed ID: 2378662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bustamante DK; Braida LD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):149-60. PubMed ID: 3430374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech.
    Boothroyd A; Erickson FN; Medwetsky L
    Ear Hear; 1994 Dec; 15(6):432-42. PubMed ID: 7895939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [In-situ measurement as necessary component of hearing aid fitting].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Nov; 70(11):616-9. PubMed ID: 1755901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allowing for real ear venting effects when selecting the coupler gain of hearing aids.
    Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6):406-16. PubMed ID: 1797608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.