These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8334086)

  • 1. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.
    Johanson RB; Rice C; Doyle M; Arthur J; Anyanwu L; Ibrahim J; Warwick A; Redman CW; O'Brien PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jun; 100(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 8334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Silastic cup vacuum extractor or forceps: a comparative study.
    Svigos JM; Cave DG; Vigneswaran R; Resch A; Christiansen J
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2099728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Johanson RB; Menon BK
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000224. PubMed ID: 10796182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.
    Johanson RB; Heycock E; Carter J; Sultan AH; Walklate K; Jones PW
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl 7():23-8. PubMed ID: 25488084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery.
    Christianson LM; Bovbjerg VE; McDavitt EC; Hullfish KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 189(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 12861171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.
    Meyer L; Mailloux J; Marcoux S; Blanchet P; Meyer F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 3439447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison vacuum extractor versus forceps].
    Schaal JP; Equy V; Hoffman P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S231-43. PubMed ID: 19268200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.
    O'Mahony F; Hofmeyr GJ; Menon V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Nov; (11):CD005455. PubMed ID: 21069686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. WITHDRAWN: Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R; Menon V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Nov; 2010(11):CD000224. PubMed ID: 21069665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.
    Johanson RB; Heycock E; Carter J; Sultan AH; Walklate K; Jones PW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jun; 106(6):544-9. PubMed ID: 10426611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor.
    Bofill JA; Rust OA; Schorr SJ; Brown RC; Martin RW; Martin JN; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1325-30. PubMed ID: 8942509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery.
    Fitzpatrick M; Behan M; O'Connell PR; O'Herlihy C
    BJOG; 2003 Apr; 110(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 12699806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operative vaginal deliveries and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes - prospective analysis.
    Morávková P; Hruban L; Jančářová D; Janků P; Gerychová R; Vinklerová P; Štěpánová R; Ventruba P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 31238678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor.
    Low J; Ng TY; Chew SY
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Apr; 34(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8266153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.