These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8334929)

  • 1. Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential amplitudes are influenced by different stimulus field sizes and scotomata.
    Junghardt A; Wildberger H; Robert Y; Török B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 83(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 8334929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, pattern-reversal and pattern-offset visual evoked potentials.
    Shawkat FS; Kriss A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 94(4):307-20. PubMed ID: 9858091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Effect of stimulus field and central scotoma.
    Sakaue H; Katsumi O; Mehta M; Hirose T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 2318589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jul; 69(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 3168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of hemifield stimulation on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Tetsuka S; Mehta MC; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1993; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 8321516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pattern electroretinogram, visual evoked potential and psychophysical functions in maculopathy.
    Junghardt A; Wildberger H; Török B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 8846732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated.
    Bradnam M; Keating D; Montgomery D; Evans A; Damato B; Cluckie A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 79(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 1591969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Steady-state pattern electroretinogram and short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in glaucomatous and healthy eyes.
    Amarasekera DC; Resende AF; Waisbourd M; Puri S; Moster MR; Hark LA; Katz LJ; Fudemberg SJ; Mantravadi AV
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 46(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 28600806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of experimental scotoma size and shape on the binocular and monocular pattern visual evoked potential.
    Geer I; Spafford MM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 7813381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinogram recording on visual evoked potentials.
    Matsui Y; Saito I; Okinami S; Oono S
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 7813380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of stimulus contrast on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.
    Tetsuka S; Katsumi O; Mehta M; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1992; 24(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 1608596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of light scatter, defocusing, mean luminosity, contrast, and central scotoma on the PVER amplitude-check size function curve.
    Katsumi O; Tetsuka H; Tetsuka S; Hoon-Ohn Y; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1993 Oct; 71(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 8109206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between visual field defect and multifocal electroretinogram.
    Yoshii M; Yanashima K; Matsuno K; Wakaguri T; Kikuchi Y; Okisaka S
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1998; 42(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9587847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. III. Effect of stimulus size and localization.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Dec; 64(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 3811882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The pattern visual evoked potential and pattern electroretinogram in drusen-associated optic neuropathy.
    Scholl GB; Song HS; Winkler DE; Wray SH
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Jan; 110(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 1731726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of central scotomata on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with maculopathy and healthy subjects.
    Fukui R; Kato M; Kuroiwa Y
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Apr; 63(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 2419089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable effects of pathologic scotomata on wave form of pattern-reversal visual evoked response.
    Blumhardt LD
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 3996186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of visual field size on hemispheric asymmetry of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Mecacci L; Spinelli D; Viggiano MP
    Int J Neurosci; 1990 Mar; 51(1-2):141-51. PubMed ID: 2265903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Pattern ERG in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Effect of pattern size, contrast and retinal eccentricity].
    Pfeiffer N; Birkner-Binder D; Bach M
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):815-8. PubMed ID: 1794811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retest variability and diurnal effects in the pattern electroretinogram.
    Otto T; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1996-1997; 92(4):311-23. PubMed ID: 9476598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.