These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8335329)

  • 1. Estimating the 95% effective defibrillation dose.
    Malkin RA; Burdick DS; Johnson EE; Pilkington TC; Swanson DK; Ideker RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 8335329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating defibrillation efficacy using combined upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation testing.
    Malkin RA; Pilkington TC; Ideker RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Jan; 43(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 8567007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental verification of theoretical predictions concerning the optimum defibrillation waveform.
    Malkin RA; Jackson SR; Nguyen J; Yang Z; Guan D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16916083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions.
    Sepulveda NG; Wikswo JP; Echt DS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Apr; 37(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 2338348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A four-shock Bayesian up-down estimator of the 80% effective defibrillation dose.
    Malkin RA; Herre JM; McGowen L; Tenzer MM; Onufer JR; Stamato NJ; Wood M; Bernstein RC
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 10(7):973-80. PubMed ID: 10413377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the defibrillation efficacy for 5-ms waveforms.
    Guan D; Malkin R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Apr; 15(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 15089995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Atrial defibrillator].
    Jung W; Lüderitz B
    Z Kardiol; 2000; 89 Suppl 3():206-14. PubMed ID: 10810804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models.
    Mocanu D; Kettenbach J; Sweeney MO; Kikinis R; Kenknight BH; Eisenberg SR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 15125713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical defibrillation optimization: an automated, iterative parallel finite-element approach.
    Hutchinson SA; Ng KT; Shadid JN; Nadeem A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Apr; 44(4):278-89. PubMed ID: 9125810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study.
    Natarajan S; Henthorn R; Burroughs J; Esberg D; Zweibel S; Ross T; Kroll M; Gianola D; Oza A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S139-42. PubMed ID: 17302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate termination of fibrillation at 50% probability of overall success correlates with defibrillation dose-response curve width.
    Tovar OH; Snyder DE; Jones JL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 15(10):1207-11. PubMed ID: 15485449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cardioverter-defibrillator implantations without thoracotomy: clinical experience with various electrode configurations and defibrillation wave forms of an endocardial/subcutaneous defibrillator system].
    Neuzner J; Huth C; Friedl A; Reinisch P; Pitschner HF; Schlepper M
    Z Kardiol; 1993 Feb; 82(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8465572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An up-down Bayesian, defibrillation efficacy estimator.
    Compos AT; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 May; 20(5 Pt 1):1292-300. PubMed ID: 9170129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).
    Morrison LJ; Dorian P; Long J; Vermeulen M; Schwartz B; Sawadsky B; Frank J; Cameron B; Burgess R; Shield J; Bagley P; Mausz V; Brewer JE; Lerman BB;
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 15992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the efficacy and safety of a novel monophasic waveform delivered by the passive implantable atrial defibrillator with biphasic waveforms in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Manoharan G; Evans N; Allen D; Anderson J; Adgey J
    Circulation; 2004 Apr; 109(13):1686-92. PubMed ID: 15051642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the parameter distributions of defibrillation shock efficacy curves in a large population.
    Smits K; Virag N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1314-25. PubMed ID: 20069370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Optimization of the performance of electric defibrillation of the heart].
    Amosov GG; Fomichev DI
    Med Tekh; 1992; (4):7-9. PubMed ID: 1435152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.