These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8336878)

  • 21. Clinical impact of the disposable ventouse iCup® versus a metallic vacuum cup: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Equy V; David-Tchouda S; Dreyfus M; Riethmuller D; Vendittelli F; Cabaud V; Langer B; Margier J; Bosson JL; Schaal JP
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():332. PubMed ID: 26666981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Vacca A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Apr; 46(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 16638034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retinal hemorrhages in the newborn.
    Bergen R; Margolis S
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1976 Jan; 8(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 1247262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Kiwi Omnicup versus Malmstrom metal cup in vacuum assisted delivery: a randomized comparative trial.
    Ismail NA; Saharan WS; Zaleha MA; Jaafar R; Muhammad JA; Razi ZR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Jun; 34(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 18686348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between metal cup and silicone rubber cup vacuum extractor.
    Loghis C; Pyrgiotis E; Panayotopoulos N; Batalias L; Salamalekis E; Zourlas PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Jul; 45(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 1511762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative study of two single-use vacuum extractor].
    Bothuyne-Queste E; Deruelle P; Closset E; Depret S; Subtil D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Apr; 38(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 19095377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between the conventional Malmström extractor and a new extractor with Silastic cup.
    Hammarström M; Csemiczky G; Belfrage P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(7):791-2. PubMed ID: 3544665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Incidence of retinal vascular lesions caused by delivery].
    Zisa F; Capozzi A; Ceccarello PL
    Minerva Ginecol; 1975 Apr; 27(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 1169723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor.
    Putta LV; Spencer JP
    Am Fam Physician; 2000 Sep; 62(6):1316-20. PubMed ID: 11011860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.
    Groom KM; Jones BA; Miller N; Paterson-Brown S
    BJOG; 2006 Feb; 113(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 16411996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Dual chamber safety vacuum--initial experiences with a new suction cup].
    Korell M; King S; Hepp H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 54(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 8088493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A randomised controlled trial of two instruments for vacuum-assisted delivery (Vacca Re-Usable OmniCup and the Bird anterior and posterior cups) to compare failure rates, safety and use effectiveness.
    Mola GD; Kuk JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 50(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 20618242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.
    Gleeson NC; Gormally SM; Morrison JJ; O'Regan M
    Ir Med J; 1992 Dec; 85(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 1473948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vacuum delivery at The Maternity Hospital Kuala Lumpur: a comparison of metal and silicone cups.
    Lee HY; Subramaniam N; Nordin MM
    Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8783915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery.
    Simonson C; Barlow P; Dehennin N; Sphel M; Toppet V; Murillo D; Rozenberg S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):626-33. PubMed ID: 17329513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cup detachment during vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and birth outcome.
    Krispin E; Aviram A; Salman L; Chen R; Wiznitzer A; Gabbay-Benziv R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 296(5):877-883. PubMed ID: 28871450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.