These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8336882)

  • 1. The peer-review system.
    Pitkin RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):304-5. PubMed ID: 8336882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Web manuscript submission and tracking system for peer review. The journal moves with the time.
    Schroeder TV; Beard JD
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 23(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 11863324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The review system comes under fire.
    Ibuki K
    Cleft Palate J; 1983 Apr; 20(2):172-3. PubMed ID: 6573985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Peer review in medical journals].
    Matías-Guiu J
    Rev Neurol; 1996 Jul; 24(131):765-6. PubMed ID: 8681185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pros and cons of open peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Mar; 2(3):197-8. PubMed ID: 10195206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review unmasked.
    Brunier G
    J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review.
    Roe IL
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):365. PubMed ID: 677147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review of scientific papers.
    Armstrong JS
    J Biol Response Mod; 1984; 3(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6707695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of peer review to scientific progress.
    Sly RM
    Ann Allergy; 1989 Aug; 63(2):85. PubMed ID: 2764318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimenting with peer review.
    Jabri E
    ACS Chem Biol; 2006 Jul; 1(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 17163762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information for peer reviewers.
    Huston P
    CMAJ; 1994 Apr; 150(8):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8162544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review and the New York State Dental Journal.
    Feinberg E
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(6):30-2. PubMed ID: 9333728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2000; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10818811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing the costs of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: fearsome foe or friendly facilitator?
    Waring GO
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1989; 5(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 2488807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review always helps but never cures.
    J Health Soc Behav; 1989 Sep; 30(3):iv-v. PubMed ID: 2778296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.