BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8336907)

  • 1. Diffractive bifocal lens designs.
    Cohen AL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):461-8. PubMed ID: 8336907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of age, decentration, aberrations and pupil size on subjective image quality with concentric bifocal optics.
    Rio D; Woog K; Legras R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 27196105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of contact lens zone geometry and ocular optics on bifocal retinal image quality.
    Bradley A; Nam J; Xu R; Harman L; Thibos L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 May; 34(3):331-45. PubMed ID: 24588552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical performance of decentered bifocal contact lenses.
    Woods RL; Saunders JE; Port MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Mar; 70(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 8483576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chromatic aberration and polychromatic image quality with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Ravikumar S; Bradley A; Thibos LN
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1192-204. PubMed ID: 24957438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical quality of rotationally symmetrical contact lenses derived from their power profiles.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Monsálvez-Romín D; Papadatou E
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 28522252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding the diffractive bifocal contact lens.
    Klein SA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):439-60. PubMed ID: 8336906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R; Rio D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffractive properties of the Diffrax bifocal contact lens.
    Atchison DA; Thibos LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Apr; 13(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 8265155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective and objective assessment of soft bifocal contact lens performance.
    Bullimore MA; Jacobs RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 8336908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses.
    Chateau N; Baude D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jul; 74(7):532-9. PubMed ID: 9293522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory Evaluation of the Influence of Decentration and Pupil Size on the Optical Performance of a Monofocal, Bifocal, and Trifocal Intraocular Lens.
    Tandogan T; Son HS; Choi CY; Knorz MC; Auffarth GU; Khoramnia R
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(12):808-812. PubMed ID: 29227508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffractive bifocal contact lenses in aphakia and pseudophakia. A pilot study.
    Barton K; Freeman MH; Woodward EG; Buckley RJ
    Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 3)():344-7. PubMed ID: 1955058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chromatic aberration and optical power of a diffractive bifocal contact lens.
    Atchison DA; Ye M; Bradley A; Collins MJ; Zhang X; Rahman HA; Thibos LN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 69(10):797-804. PubMed ID: 1437002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical design considerations for contact lens bifocals.
    Erickson P; Robboy M; Apollonio A; Jones WF
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 3351186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro optical quality measurements of three intraocular lens models having identical platform.
    Son HS; Tandogan T; Liebing S; Merz P; Choi CY; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):108. PubMed ID: 28662629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs.
    Faria-Ribeiro M; Amorim-de-Sousa A; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 29383756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye: point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Pieh S; Marvan P; Lackner B; Hanselmayer G; Schmidinger G; Leitgeb R; Sticker M; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF; Skorpik C
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 120(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11786053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multifocal contact lenses: towards customisation?
    Faria-Ribeiro M; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 30628741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.