These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8336912)

  • 1. Comparing the amplitude of accommodation determined objectively and subjectively.
    Rutstein RP; Fuhr PD; Swiatocha J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):496-500. PubMed ID: 8336912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Different Methods of Measuring Accommodative Amplitude with Hofstetter's Normative Values in a Ghanaian Population.
    Abu EK; Ocansey S; Yennu J; Asirifi I; Marfo R
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Sep; 43(9):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 29787692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Research Progress in Measurement of Human Accommodative Amplitude].
    Long E; Lin H
    Eye Sci; 2015 Sep; 30(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 26930838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age and the amplitude of accommodation measured using dynamic retinoscopy.
    León A; Estrada JM; Rosenfield M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jan; 36(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 26353999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.
    León AÁ; Medrano SM; Rosenfield M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 22268597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amplitude of Accommodation among Students of a Malaysian Private University as Assessed Using Subjective and Objective Techniques.
    Majumder C; Afnan H
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):219-226. PubMed ID: 32495530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Dynamic Retinoscopy and Autorefraction for Measurement of Accommodative Amplitude.
    Aboumourad R; Anderson HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Sep; 96(9):670-677. PubMed ID: 31479022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of measured with calculated amplitude of accommodation in Nigerian children aged six to 16 years.
    Ovenseri-Ogbomo GO; Oduntan OA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jul; 101(4):571-577. PubMed ID: 28176467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical subjective measurement of amplitude of accommodation.
    Atchison DA; Capper EJ; McCabe KL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Nov; 71(11):699-706. PubMed ID: 7885674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of dynamic retinoscopy measurements with a print card, a video display terminal, and a PRIO System Tester as test targets.
    Penisten DK; Goss DA; Philpott G; Pham A; West RW
    Optometry; 2004 Apr; 75(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 15117056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer.
    Win-Hall DM; Ostrin LA; Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 17873774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Aging changes in accommodation--comparison of subjective method with objective method].
    Toshida K; Okuyama F; Tokoro T; Akizawa Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 May; 97(5):614-8. PubMed ID: 8337966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the dynamic cross cylinder test measure the accommodative response accurately?
    Benzoni JA; Collier JD; McHugh K; Rosenfield M; Portello JK
    Optometry; 2009 Nov; 80(11):630-4. PubMed ID: 19861218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduced accommodation in children with cerebral palsy.
    Leat SJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 8944183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation Dynamic Distance Direct Ophthalmoscopy (eDDDO): A novel, objective method for the quantitative assessment of accommodation in young children.
    Kothari M; Jain Y; Verma D; Rathod V; Jain R; Khadse N
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 67(10):1564-1569. PubMed ID: 31546481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeatability of two subjective accommodative amplitude measurements and agreement with an objective method.
    Chen Y; Zhang C; Ding C; Tao C; Bao J; Zheng J; Chen H
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Jul; 102(4):412-417. PubMed ID: 30866109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accommodative response in children and young adults using dynamic retinoscopy.
    Leat SJ; Gargon JL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8944182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Autorefractors for Measurement of Accommodation.
    Aldaba M; Gómez-López S; Vilaseca M; Pujol J; Arjona M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 92(10):1003-11. PubMed ID: 26258276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude.
    Wold JE; Hu A; Chen S; Glasser A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1878-88. PubMed ID: 14604706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.