These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8337070)

  • 1. Brainstem frequency-following responses and cortical event-related potentials during attention.
    Galbraith GC; Kane JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1231-41. PubMed ID: 8337070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective attention and brainstem frequency-following responses.
    Galbraith GC; Arroyo C
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Oct; 37(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 8110920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem frequency-following and behavioral responses during selective attention to pure tone and missing fundamental stimuli.
    Galbraith GC; Doan BQ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1995 Apr; 19(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 7558987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory P3 event related potentials (ERP) and brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) after spinal cord injury in humans.
    Ament PA; Cohen MJ; Schandler SL; Sowa M; Vulpe M
    J Spinal Cord Med; 1995 Jul; 18(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 7552427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem, and cerebral evoked potentials.
    Hackley SA; Woldorff M; Hillyard SA
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Mar; 27(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 2247550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of relative starting phase and frequency separation of two-tone stimuli on the brain-stem auditory-evoked response.
    Sammeth CA; Burkard RF; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1405-9. PubMed ID: 1939905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of click frequency bands to the human binaural interaction components.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):321-7. PubMed ID: 10582533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The late Nd reflects a memory trace containing amodal spatial information.
    Meehan S; Singhal A; Fowler B
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Sep; 42(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 16176375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of inter- and intramodal selective attention to non-spatial visual stimuli: an event-related potential analysis.
    de Ruiter MB; Kok A; van der Schoot M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Nov; 49(3):269-94. PubMed ID: 9858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concentrated pitch discrimination modulates auditory brainstem responses during contralateral noise exposure.
    Ikeda K; Sekiguchi T; Hayashi A
    Neuroreport; 2010 Mar; 21(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 20134353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response.
    Galbraith GC; Olfman DM; Huffman TM
    Neuroreport; 2003 Apr; 14(5):735-8. PubMed ID: 12692473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention-related modulation of auditory brainstem responses during contralateral noise exposure.
    Ikeda K; Sekiguchi T; Hayashi A
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(16):1593-9. PubMed ID: 18806689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding.
    Deiber MP; Rodriguez C; Jaques D; Missonnier P; Emch J; Millet P; Gold G; Giannakopoulos P; Ibañez V
    Neuroscience; 2010 Nov; 171(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 20801196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.
    Varghese L; Bharadwaj HM; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():146-64. PubMed ID: 26187756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards an optimal paradigm for simultaneously recording cortical and brainstem auditory evoked potentials.
    Bidelman GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Feb; 241():94-100. PubMed ID: 25561397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The stabilization of cortical evoked potentials during selective visual attention].
    Krylov IN; Shuvaev IN; Tret'iakov DA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1998; 48(6):926-35. PubMed ID: 9929902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products.
    Gnanateja GN; Maruthy S
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():84-99. PubMed ID: 31212114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.