BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8337097)

  • 1. Movement of the tibial end in a PTB prosthesis socket: a sagittal X-ray study of the PTB prosthesis.
    Lilja M; Johansson T; Oberg T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Apr; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8337097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: a comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis.
    Narita H; Yokogushi K; Shii S; Kakizawa M; Nosaka T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9453088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of biomechanical interactions at the stump-socket interface in lower limb prostheses.
    Noll V; Wojtusch J; Schuy J; Grimmer M; Beckerle P; Rinderknecht S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():5517-20. PubMed ID: 26737541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of prosthesis alignment on pressure distribution at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees during unsupported stance and gait.
    Seelen HA; Anemaat S; Janssen HM; Deckers JH
    Clin Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 17(7):787-96. PubMed ID: 14606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
    Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Limb Loss Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray: Protocol for a Lower Limb Loss Cadaver and Clinical Study.
    Maikos JT; Chomack JM; Herlihy DV; Paglia DN; Wetterstrand C; O'Connor JP; Hyre MJ; Loan JP; D'Andrea SE
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Apr; 13():e57329. PubMed ID: 38669065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee.
    Convery P; Buis AW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 9881607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Easy Technique for Radiographic Evaluation of Stump-socket Fit in Below-knee Amputees.
    Tsur A
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2019 Feb; 21(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 31019111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions.
    Board WJ; Street GM; Caspers C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Dec; 25(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 11860094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marker-based method to measure movement between the residual limb and a transtibial prosthetic socket.
    Childers WL; Siebert S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Dec; 40(6):720-728. PubMed ID: 26527758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of amputee socket-stump-residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis.
    Papaioannou G; Mitrogiannis C; Nianios G; Fiedler G
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):871-8. PubMed ID: 20047746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee wearing a hydrocast socket.
    Convery P; Buis AW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Aug; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10493137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gait patterns of elderly men with trans-tibial amputations.
    Lemaire ED; Fisher FR; Robertson DG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Apr; 17(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8337098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element modelling of an energy-storing prosthetic foot during the stance phase of transtibial amputee gait.
    Bonnet X; Pillet H; Fodé P; Lavaste F; Skalli W
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Jan; 226(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 22888587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A photoelastic clinical study of the static load distribution at the stump/socket interface of PTB sockets.
    Sewell P; Vinney J; Noroozi S; Amali R; Andrews S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 16466158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape in a Developing Country: A study to compare initial outcomes in Pressure Cast hydrostatic and Patella Tendon Bearing designs.
    Laing S; Lythgo N; Lavranos J; Lee PVS
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():363-368. PubMed ID: 28869901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angular deformity in pediatric transtibial amputation stumps.
    Ranade A; McCarthy JJ; Davidson RS
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):726-9. PubMed ID: 20104153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound study of the motion of the residual femur within a trans-femoral socket during gait.
    Convery P; Murray KD
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Dec; 24(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 11195358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses.
    Boone DA; Kobayashi T; Chou TG; Arabian AK; Coleman KL; Orendurff MS; Zhang M
    Gait Posture; 2013 Apr; 37(4):620-6. PubMed ID: 23177920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control of the residual tibia in transtibial amputation.
    Pinzur MS; Reddy N; Charuk G; Osterman H; Vrbos L
    Foot Ankle Int; 1996 Sep; 17(9):538-40. PubMed ID: 8886780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.