These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8337167)
1. Infusion port maintains excellent blood return after 77 weeks without flushing. Hopkins M Oncol Nurs Forum; 1993 Jun; 20(5):731. PubMed ID: 8337167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of normal versus heparinized saline for flushing infusion devices. Taylor N; Hutchison E; Milliken W; Larson E J Nurs Qual Assur; 1989 Aug; 3(4):49-55. PubMed ID: 2639143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. National survey of central venous catheter flushing in the intensive care unit. Sona C; Prentice D; Schallom L Crit Care Nurse; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e12-9. PubMed ID: 22298726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heparin Versus Normal Saline: Flushing Effectiveness in Managing Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients With Cancer. Omatsu D; Thompson K; Maglasang B; Yuasa H; Kimata C Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2022 Jun; 26(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 35604736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Keeping central venous lines open: a prospective comparison of heparin, vitamin C and sodium chloride sealing solutions in medical patients. Rabe C; Gramann T; Sons X; Berna M; González-Carmona MA; Klehr HU; Sauerbruch T; Caselmann WH Intensive Care Med; 2002 Aug; 28(8):1172-6. PubMed ID: 12185445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of heparinization in prolonging patency of arterial and central venous catheters in children: a randomized double-blind trial. de Neef M; Heijboer H; van Woensel JB; de Haan RJ Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2002 Dec; 19(8):553-60. PubMed ID: 12487830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heparin vs normal saline. Hook ML; Ose P J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 2341959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prolonged interval in prophylactic heparin flushing for maintenance of subcutaneous implanted port care in patients with cancer. Kefeli U; Dane F; Yumuk PF; Karamanoglu A; Iyikesici S; Basaran G; Turhal NS Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Mar; 18(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19267736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Averting adhesive-related skin reactions in patients with port entry sites. Tucci RA Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992 Apr; 19(3):523. PubMed ID: 1594474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Using hypothermic analgesia for port access. Swanton H; Newman G Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992 Apr; 19(3):523. PubMed ID: 1594475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Normal saline flush vs. dilute heparin flush. Gardner C J Intraven Nurs; 1988; 11(3):206. PubMed ID: 3373368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [After-care of patients with indwelling catheters at home]. Sieulle M Soins; 1997 Oct; (619):25-7. PubMed ID: 9416207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques]. Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should saline solution be used to maintain heparin locks? Jordan L Focus Crit Care; 1991 Apr; 18(2):144-5, 147-8, 150-1. PubMed ID: 2022285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]