These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8337547)

  • 1. Stopping guidelines for clinical trials with multiple treatments.
    Hughes MD
    Stat Med; 1993 May; 12(10):901-15. PubMed ID: 8337547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the impact of efficacy stopping rules on the error rates under the multi-arm multi-stage framework.
    Blenkinsop A; Parmar MK; Choodari-Oskooei B
    Clin Trials; 2019 Apr; 16(2):132-141. PubMed ID: 30648428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information time scales for interim analyses of randomized clinical trials.
    Freidlin B; Othus M; Korn EL
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 27136947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stopping clinical trials early for benefit: impact on estimation.
    Freidlin B; Korn EL
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 19342463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decision rule for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a primary and supportive outcome.
    Zhao Y; Grambsch PM; Neaton JD
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 17456513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of stopping rules on heterogeneity of results in overviews of clinical trials.
    Hughes MD; Freedman LS; Pocock SJ
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 1581492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-arm group sequential designs with a simultaneous stopping rule.
    Urach S; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(30):5536-5550. PubMed ID: 27550822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interim analyses in clinical trials.
    Emerson SS; Fleming TR
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1990 Mar; 4(3):126-33; discussion 134, 136. PubMed ID: 2144441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An introduction to the use of interim data analyses in clinical trials.
    Lewis RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1993 Sep; 22(9):1463-9. PubMed ID: 8363121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the bias in the estimated treatment effect in randomized trials having interim analyses and a rule for early stopping for futility.
    Walter SD; Han H; Briel M; Guyatt GH
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1506-1518. PubMed ID: 28183155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of lack-of-benefit stopping rules on treatment effect estimates of two-arm multi-stage (TAMS) trials with time to event outcome.
    Choodari-Oskooei B; Parmar MK; Royston P; Bowden J
    Trials; 2013 Jan; 14():23. PubMed ID: 23343147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of futility in clinical trials.
    Snapinn S; Chen MG; Jiang Q; Koutsoukos T
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 17128426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of the O'Brien-Fleming multiple testing procedure in the presence of intraclass correlation.
    Lui KJ
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 8086606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying over-estimation in early stopped clinical trials and the "freezing effect" on subsequent research.
    Wang H; Rosner GL; Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):621-631. PubMed ID: 27271682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analyses.
    Schulz KF; Grimes DA
    Lancet; 2005 May 7-13; 365(9471):1657-61. PubMed ID: 15885299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing overestimation of the treatment effect by interim analysis when designing clinical trials.
    Shimura M
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2019 Apr; 44(2):243-248. PubMed ID: 30414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An additive boundary for group sequential designs with connection to conditional error.
    Xi D; Gallo P
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4656-4669. PubMed ID: 31338847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.