These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8338069)

  • 1. Timing of cervical headgear treatment based on skeletal maturation.
    Kopecky GR; Fishman LS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 8338069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of maxillary anteroposterior position on profile esthetics in headgear-treated patients.
    Mann KR; Marshall SD; Qian F; Southard KA; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 21300252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Firouz M; Zernik J; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 1510043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Hubbard GW; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 7802330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear].
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The effect of cervical headgear on the cant of occlusal plane].
    Gültan A
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 2489151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment].
    Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective treatment plan for maxillary protraction: is the bone age useful to determine the treatment plan?
    Suda N; Ishii-Suzuki M; Hirose K; Hiyama S; Suzuki S; Kuroda T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 10893473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in class II correction.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T; Hurmerinta K; Haavikko K
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 10961782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.
    Burke M; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Dec; 102(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 1456230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of cervical headgear therapy on point B in class II, division 1 cases].
    Ulgen M; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 2489160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.