These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Study on perception of Shanghai population with labial profile]. Tang GH; Ji GP; Ding XJ Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Apr; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14661511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationships between facial features in the perception of profile attractiveness. Torsello F; Graci M; Grande NM; Deli R Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 20974445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis. Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients. Shimomura T; Ioi H; Nakata S; Counts AL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):e291-7. PubMed ID: 21457834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles. Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15898368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial soft tissue values in Persian adults with normal occlusion and well-balanced faces. Taki AA; Oguz F; Abuhijleh E Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):491-4. PubMed ID: 19413374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chin, nose, and lips. Normal ratios in young men and women. Skinazi GL; Lindauer SJ; Isaacson RJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 7977193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study. Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles. Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile]. De Coster T Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study. Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method. Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile. Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population. Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-perception of the facial profile: an aid in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery. Bullen RN; Kook YA; Kim K; Park JH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 24342575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]