These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8338288)

  • 1. The role of pacing modality in determining long-term survival in the sick sinus syndrome.
    Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Maloney JD
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Sep; 119(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 8338288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Survival in patients with sick sinus syndrome and artificial pacemaker. Determining clinical factors].
    Sanjuán R; Morell S; Ruiz R; Ibáñez M; Cortina J; Vicente Monmeneu J; Valls A; Blasco M; García Civera R; Botella S
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1996 Mar; 49(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 8685521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities.
    Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Maloney JD; Simmons TW; Wilkoff BL; Castle LW; Trohman RG
    Circulation; 1993 Sep; 88(3):1045-53. PubMed ID: 8353866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single lead atrial vs. dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome: extended register-based follow-up in the DANPACE trial.
    Brandt NH; Kirkfeldt RE; Nielsen JC; Mortensen LS; Jensen GVH; Johansen JB; Haugan K
    Europace; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1981-1987. PubMed ID: 28039212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.
    Andersen HR; Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Thuesen L; Mortensen PT; Vesterlund T; Pedersen AK
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9086):1210-6. PubMed ID: 9652562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-chamber ventricular pacing is not associated with worsening heart failure in sick sinus syndrome.
    Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Trohman RG; Castle LW; Maloney JD
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Apr; 73(9):693-7. PubMed ID: 8166067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.
    Dretzke J; Toff WD; Lip GY; Raftery J; Fry-Smith A; Taylor R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(2):CD003710. PubMed ID: 15106214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease.
    Sweeney MO; Bank AJ; Nsah E; Koullick M; Zeng QC; Hettrick D; Sheldon T; Lamas GA;
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Sep; 357(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 17804844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome.
    Andersen HR; Thuesen L; Bagger JP; Vesterlund T; Thomsen PE
    Lancet; 1994 Dec; 344(8936):1523-8. PubMed ID: 7983951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing.
    Nielsen JC; Andersen HR; Thomsen PE; Thuesen L; Mortensen PT; Vesterlund T; Pedersen AK
    Circulation; 1998 Mar; 97(10):987-95. PubMed ID: 9529267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease.
    Tripp IG; Armstrong GP; Stewart JT; Hood MA; Smith WM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 15826261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Single-chamber atrial pacing is better than single chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Results of long-term follow up in a prospective randomized study].
    Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Thuesen L; Nielsen TV; Thomsen PE; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Feb; 161(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 9989193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and predictors of loss of pacing in the atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Castle LW; Trohman RG; Maloney JD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2050-4. PubMed ID: 1279598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome.
    Tung RT; Shen WK; Hayes DL; Hammill SC; Bailey KR; Gersh BJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 74(10):1016-20. PubMed ID: 7977039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heart failure in patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with single lead atrial or dual-chamber pacing: no association with pacing mode or right ventricular pacing site.
    Riahi S; Nielsen JC; Hjortshøj S; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Dalsgaard D; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
    Europace; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1475-82. PubMed ID: 22447958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of site and rate of atrial pacing on long-term progression of atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome: Septal Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Evaluation (SAFE) Study.
    Lau CP; Tachapong N; Wang CC; Wang JF; Abe H; Kong CW; Liew R; Shin DG; Padeletti L; Kim YH; Omar R; Jirarojanakorn K; Kim YN; Chen MC; Sriratanasathavorn C; Munawar M; Kam R; Chen JY; Cho YK; Li YG; Wu SL; Bailleul C; Tse HF;
    Circulation; 2013 Aug; 128(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 23868858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of left ventricular function in sick sinus syndrome on different long-term pacing modes.
    Mohan JC; Sethi KK; Arora R; Khalilullah M
    Indian Heart J; 1994; 46(6):303-6. PubMed ID: 7797215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.