BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8338295)

  • 21. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men remains cost-effective with contemporary epidemiology and management.
    Svensjö S; Mani K; Björck M; Lundkvist J; Wanhainen A
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 24485841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Changes to the Surveillance Intervals in the UK Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme.
    Sweeting MJ; Marshall J; Glover M; Nasim A; Bown MJ
    Value Health; 2021 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 33641771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Echographic screening of the abdominal aorta in older men is useful].
    Boll AP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(13):750. PubMed ID: 18461892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Netherlands and Norway.
    Spronk S; van Kempen BJ; Boll AP; Jørgensen JJ; Hunink MG; Kristiansen IS
    Br J Surg; 2011 Nov; 98(11):1546-55. PubMed ID: 21725968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Bergqvist D; Björck M
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 May; 41(5):741-51; discussion 751. PubMed ID: 15886653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of screening 65-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on data from an implemented screening programme.
    Hager J; Henriksson M; Carlsson P; Länne T; Lundgren F
    Int Angiol; 2017 Dec; 36(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 27905693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening, diagnosis and advances in aortic aneurysm surgery.
    Daly KJ; Torella F; Ashleigh R; McCollum CN
    Gerontology; 2004; 50(6):349-59. PubMed ID: 15477695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Monte Carlo-based estimates.
    Pentikäinen TJ; Sipilä T; Rissanen P; Soisalon-Soininen S; Salo J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 10815351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic adults.
    Ali MU; Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Miller J; Warren R; Kenny M; Sherifali D; Raina P
    J Vasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 64(6):1855-1868. PubMed ID: 27871502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen For Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act.
    Lee ES; Pickett E; Hedayati N; Dawson DL; Pevec WC
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1107-11. PubMed ID: 19307082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms from a randomized controlled trial.
    Lindholt JS; Sørensen J; Søgaard R; Henneberg EW
    Br J Surg; 2010 Jun; 97(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 20473995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: recommendations and controversies.
    Longo C; Upchurch GR
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2005; 39(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 15920649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of intensive smoking cessation therapy among patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Mani K; Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Lindström D
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 54(3):628-36. PubMed ID: 21620630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrasonography screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Guirguis-Blake JM; Beil TL; Senger CA; Whitlock EP
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Mar; 160(5):321-9. PubMed ID: 24473919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Elective versus ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a 1-year cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Cota AM; Omer AA; Jaipersad AS; Wilson NV
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 19(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 16177868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence.
    Ball BZ; Jiang B; Mehndiratta P; Stukenborg GJ; Upchurch GR; Meschia JF; Worrall BB; Southerland AM
    J Vasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 64(3):811-818.e3. PubMed ID: 27565600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in siblings.
    Hultgren R; Linné A; Svensjö S
    Br J Surg; 2019 Feb; 106(3):206-216. PubMed ID: 30702746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
    Arch Intern Med; 2008 Apr; 168(7):696-705. PubMed ID: 18413551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.
    Thompson SG; Ashton HA; Gao L; Scott RA;
    BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2307. PubMed ID: 19553269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Cost.
    Ying AJ; Affan ET
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 54():298-303.e3. PubMed ID: 30081169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.