BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8338515)

  • 1. Supreme Court to weigh science.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):588-90. PubMed ID: 8338515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Admissibility of scientific testimony into evidence.
    Brushwood DB
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Mar; 51(5):683-5. PubMed ID: 8203391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court ruling on 'junk science' gives judges more say about what expert witness testimony to allow.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):423. PubMed ID: 8320770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Daubert v Merrell Dow. The Supreme Court tackles scientific evidence in the courtroom.
    Gold JA; Zaremski MJ; Lev ER; Shefrin DH
    JAMA; 1993 Dec 22-29; 270(24):2964-7. PubMed ID: 8018140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bendectin case dismissed.
    Barinaga M
    Science; 1995 Jan; 267(5195):167. PubMed ID: 7809619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Appelbaum PS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 Jan; 45(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 8125472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science, law, and the search for truth in the courtroom: lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow.
    Bertin JE; Henifin MS
    J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(1):6-20. PubMed ID: 8173660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Debendox in the dock.
    Brown A
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Feb; 150(8):8-9. PubMed ID: 6899313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supreme Court to judges: start thinking like scientists.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1993 Jul; 261(5117):22. PubMed ID: 8316850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dr. Brent and scientific debate.
    Newman SA
    Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 10453908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The debendox saga.
    Orme ML
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Oct; 291(6500):918-9. PubMed ID: 3929963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debendox is not thalidomide.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):205-6. PubMed ID: 6146759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to Dr. Brent's commentary on "Dr. Brent and scientific debate".
    Newman SA
    Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 10532797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bendectin.
    DeSesso JM
    Reprod Toxicol; 2001; 15(6):733. PubMed ID: 11738529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bendectin--birth defects controversy.
    Newman SA
    JAMA; 1990 Aug; 264(5):569-70. PubMed ID: 2366291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal malformation after Debendox treatment in early pregnancy.
    Br Med J; 1978 Apr; 1(6119):1055-6. PubMed ID: 638604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional follow-up of congenital limb disorders in relation to Bendectin use.
    Aselton PJ; Jick H
    JAMA; 1983 Jul; 250(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 6682906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bendectin: review of the medical literature of a comprehensively studied human nonteratogen and the most prevalent tortogen-litigen.
    Scialli AR
    Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):239. PubMed ID: 10453907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Debendox.
    Elbourne D; Mutch L
    Med J Aust; 1986 Mar; 144(5):280. PubMed ID: 3587104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concern for truth: driving defensively when confronting a zombie epidemic.
    Howland RH
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2013 Nov; 51(11):9-12. PubMed ID: 24124694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.