These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8339416)

  • 61. Management of high defibrillation threshold.
    Uyguanco ER; Berger A; Budzikowski AS; Gunsburg M; Kassotis J
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 6(9):1237-48. PubMed ID: 18939911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Implantation of additional defibrillation lead into the coronary sinus: an effective method of decreasing defibrillation threshold.
    Wilczek R; Swiątkowski M; Czepiel A; Sterliński M; Makowska E; Kułakowski P
    Kardiol Pol; 2011; 69(12):1308-9. PubMed ID: 22219117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Additional lead improves defibrillation efficacy with an abdominal 'hot can' electrode system.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Niebauer MJ; Tchou PJ; Wilkoff BL
    Circulation; 1997 Dec; 96(12):4400-7. PubMed ID: 9416910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Cardioverter-defibrillator implantations without thoracotomy: clinical experience with various electrode configurations and defibrillation wave forms of an endocardial/subcutaneous defibrillator system].
    Neuzner J; Huth C; Friedl A; Reinisch P; Pitschner HF; Schlepper M
    Z Kardiol; 1993 Feb; 82(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8465572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.
    Weiss DN; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 2(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 9870022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings.
    Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA; Plonsey R
    Circulation; 1990 Jul; 82(1):244-60. PubMed ID: 2364513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The implanted defibrillator: relation of defibrillating lead configuration and clinical variables to defibrillation threshold.
    Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Olinger GN; Kleinman LH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Dec; 6(6):1315-21. PubMed ID: 4067110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of a unipolar defibrillation system with a dual lead system using an enlarged defibrillation anode.
    Mattke S; Fiek M; Markewitz A; Müller D; Hoffmann E; Schmöckel M; Steinbeck G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Dec; 19(12 Pt 1):2083-8. PubMed ID: 8994947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A population-based method for the estimation of defibrillation energy requirements in humans. Assessment of time-dependent effects with a transvenous defibrillation system.
    Newman D; Barr A; Greene M; Martin D; Ham M; Thorne S; Dorian P
    Circulation; 1997 Jul; 96(1):267-73. PubMed ID: 9236444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The measurement of the paced depolarization integral using the braided endocardial lead.
    Lu RM; Dawson AK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1996-9. PubMed ID: 1279587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Right side implant of the unipolar single lead defibrillation system.
    Natale A; Sra J; Geiger MJ; Newby K; Akhtar M; Pacifico A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Aug; 20(8 Pt 1):1910-2. PubMed ID: 9272527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Long-term internal cardiac defibrillation threshold stability.
    Wetherbee JN; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Veseth-Rogers J; Thakur RK; Almassi GH; Olinger GN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Mar; 12(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 2466270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Virtual electrode effects in transvenous defibrillation-modulation by structure and interface: evidence from bidomain simulations and optical mapping.
    Entcheva E; Eason J; Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Malkin R; Claydon F
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 9(9):949-61. PubMed ID: 9786075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Relationship of left ventricular mass to defibrillation threshold for the implantable defibrillator: a combined clinical and animal study.
    Chapman PD; Sagar KB; Wetherbee JN; Troup PJ
    Am Heart J; 1987 Aug; 114(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 3604882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Defibrillation efficacy of a subcutaneous array lead: A case report.
    Hadano Y; Ogawa H; Wakeyama T; Takaki A; Iwami T; Kimura M; Miyazaki Y; Okada H; Shimizu A; Matsuzaki M
    J Cardiol Cases; 2010 Feb; 1(1):e21-e24. PubMed ID: 30615746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Changes in human coronary sinus blood flow and myocardial metabolism induced by ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.
    Runsiö M; Bergfeldt L; Rosenqvist M; Owall A; Jorfeldt L
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1998 Feb; 12(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 9509356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Complications of defibrillation with permanent pacemaker in situ.
    Aylward P; Blood R; Tonkin A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1979 Jul; 2(4):462-4. PubMed ID: 95315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. New low energy transvenous cardioverting and pacing electrode.
    Bourgeois I; Smits K; Kallok M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Mar; 6(2 Pt 2):475-81. PubMed ID: 6189095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Unipolar pectoral defibrillation systems.
    Reddy RK; Bardy GH
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 2):600-6. PubMed ID: 9058858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The economic impact of transvenous defibrillation lead systems.
    Williamson BD; Man KC; Niebauer M; Daoud E; Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Morady F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Dec; 17(12 Pt 1):2297-303. PubMed ID: 7885938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.