These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8339416)

  • 81. Rise in chronic defibrillation energy requirements necessitating implantable defibrillator lead system revision.
    Daoud EG; Man KC; Morady F; Strickberger SA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Mar; 20(3 Pt 1):714-9. PubMed ID: 9080498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Adverse acute and chronic effects of electrical defibrillation and cardioversion on implanted unipolar cardiac pacing systems.
    Levine PA; Barold SS; Fletcher RD; Talbot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Jun; 1(6):1413-22. PubMed ID: 6853897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Left axillary active can positioning markedly reduces defibrillation threshold of a transvenous defibrillator failing to defibrillate at maximum output.
    Mitra RL
    HeartRhythm Case Rep; 2019 Jan; 5(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 30693203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. A Novel Defibrillation Tool: Percutaneously Delivered, Partially Insulated Epicardial Defibrillation.
    Killu AM; Naksuk N; Stárek Z; DeSimone CV; Syed FF; Gaba P; Wolf J; Lehar F; Pesl M; Leinveber P; Crha M; Ladewig D; Powers J; Suddendorf S; Hodge DO; Satam G; Novák M; Kara T; Bruce CJ; Friedman PA; Asirvatham SJ
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 3(7):747-755. PubMed ID: 28736750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Early postoperative rise in defibrillation threshold associated with hematoma formation with unipolar defibrillation system.
    Yazmajian DY; Schwartzman D; Callans DJ; Gottieb CD; Marchlinski FE
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 1(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 9869962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Surface coverage effects on defibrillation impedance for transvenous electrodes.
    Pendekanti R; Henriquez C; Tomassoni G; Miner W; Fain E; Hoffmann D; Wolf P
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1997; 25(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 9236986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Optogenetics design of mechanistically-based stimulation patterns for cardiac defibrillation.
    Crocini C; Ferrantini C; Coppini R; Scardigli M; Yan P; Loew LM; Smith G; Cerbai E; Poggesi C; Pavone FS; Sacconi L
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35628. PubMed ID: 27748433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Concept of defibrillation vector in the management of high defibrillation threshold.
    Hayes K; Deshmukh A; Pant S; Tobler G; Paydak H
    World J Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 5(4):106-8. PubMed ID: 23675557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Failure of communication and capture: The perils of temporary unipolar pacing system.
    Sahinoglu E; Wool TJ; Wool KJ
    J Arrhythm; 2015 Jun; 31(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 26336552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Transvenous catheter defibrillation for prevention of sudden cardiac death.
    Mirowski M; Mower MM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 11(2):371-2. PubMed ID: 3339176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Effect of defibrillation pulses of different shapes on biomembranes: experimental study.
    Moroz VV; Bogushevich MS; Chernysh AM; Kozlova EK; Sharakshane AS
    Bull Exp Biol Med; 2004 Feb; 137(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 15273753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Diathermy-induced Ventricular Fibrillation.
    Chacko S; Haseeb SB; Haseeb S; DeBono J; Marshall H
    J Innov Card Rhythm Manag; 2021 Feb; 12(2):4410-4412. PubMed ID: 33654572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. 50 years of successfull human defibrillation. A history of continuing progress.
    Esperer HD; Klein HU
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 8(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 19484329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. [History of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in Germany].
    Block M; Klein HU
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2024 Mar; 35(Suppl 1):55-67. PubMed ID: 38421401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Routine DFT testing in patients undergoing ICD implantation does not improve mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kannabhiran M; Mustafa U; Acharya M; Telles N; Alexandria B; Reddy P; Dominic P
    J Arrhythm; 2018 Dec; 34(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 30555603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.
    Neuzner J; Carlsson J
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 101(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 22231644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Experience with unipolar pectoral defibrillation.
    Reddy RK; Bardy GH
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 1997 Mar; 8(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 19495675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. [Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].
    Block M; Hammel D; Breithardt G
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 1997 Mar; 8(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 19495674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Defibrillation testing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: when, how, and by whom?
    Pires LA
    Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J; 2007 Aug; 7(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 17684575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.