BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8339483)

  • 1. A histomorphometric and histologic analysis of the implant interface in five successful, autopsy-retrieved, noncemented porous-coated knee arthroplasties.
    Vigorita VJ; Minkowitz B; Dichiara JF; Higham PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Aug; (293):211-8. PubMed ID: 8339483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histologic analysis of retrieved human porous-coated total joint components.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Haddad RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Sep; (234):90-101. PubMed ID: 3409607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of porous ingrowth in intervertebral disc prostheses: a nonhuman primate model.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Orbegoso CM; Sefter JC; Dmitriev AE; Fedder IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 12590205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
    Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative histologic analysis of tissue growth into porous total knee components.
    Cook SD; Barrack RL; Thomas KA; Haddad RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1989; 4 Suppl():S33-43. PubMed ID: 2584985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The nature of the bone-implant interface. The lessons learned from implant retrieval and analysis in man and experimental animal.
    Boss JH; Shajrawi I; Mendes DG
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(3-4):119-42. PubMed ID: 7877558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prosthesis-bone interface in total knee arthroplasty.
    Matthews LS; Goldstein SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Mar; (276):50-5. PubMed ID: 1537174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Histology of the implant-bone interface in cemented and uncemented endoprostheses].
    Herren T; Remagen W; Schenk R
    Orthopade; 1987 Jun; 16(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 3306564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.
    Qin YX; McLeod KJ; Guilak F; Chiang FP; Rubin CT
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Nov; 14(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 8982127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Porous-coated knee arthroplasty. A case report concerning bone ingrowth.
    Hainau B; Reimann I; Dorph S; Rechnagel K; Henschel A; Kragh F
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Feb; (239):178-84. PubMed ID: 2912618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design.
    Andreykiv A; Prendergast PJ; van Keulen F; Swieszkowski W; Rozing PM
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1023-33. PubMed ID: 15797584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm.
    Liu X; Niebur GL
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Aug; 7(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 17701434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experimental study of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in noncemented fixation of prosthesis].
    Wang Y; Wang ST; Cui J; Zhou YG; Mu MW
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 42(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 15062046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced bone ingrowth and fixation strength with hydroxyapatite-coated porous implants.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Dalton JE; Kay JF
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1991 Oct; 2(4):268-79. PubMed ID: 10171176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new model to assess tibial fixation. II. Concurrent histologic and biomechanical observations.
    Stulberg BN; Watson JT; Stulberg SD; Bauer TW; Manley MT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Feb; (263):303-9. PubMed ID: 1993387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of surface modification of a porous TiO2/perlite composite on the ingrowth of bone tissue in vivo.
    Erli HJ; Rüger M; Ragoss C; Jahnen-Dechent W; Hollander DA; Paar O; von Walter M
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(8):1270-6. PubMed ID: 16139880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histologic and microradiographic analysis of a revised porous-coated anatomic (PCA) patellar component. A case report.
    Cook SD; Scheller AD; Anderson RC; Haddad RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Jan; (202):147-51. PubMed ID: 3514023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bone/cement interface reactions following several years of implantation and consequences for its fixation].
    Köller W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 8480445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mineral apposition rates of human cancellous bone at the interface of porous coated implants.
    Bloebaum RD; Bachus KN; Momberger NG; Hofmann AA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 May; 28(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 8027094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.