346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8339717)
1. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
Waters TR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E
Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.
Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
Ergonomics; 1997 Sep; 40(9):916-27. PubMed ID: 9306742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
Dempsey PG
Ergonomics; 2002 Oct; 45(12):817-28. PubMed ID: 12487684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When is it safe to manually lift a patient?
Waters TR
Am J Nurs; 2007 Aug; 107(8):53-8; quiz 59. PubMed ID: 17667392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revised NIOSH equation for manual lifting: a method for job evaluation.
Garg A
AAOHN J; 1995 Apr; 43(4):211-6; quiz 217-8. PubMed ID: 7772206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Physiological and psychophysical comparison between a lifting task with identical weight but different coupling factors.
Adams KJ; DeBeliso M; Sevene-Adams PG; Berning JM; Miller T; Tollerud DJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 20072069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
Ranavolo A; Varrecchia T; Rinaldi M; Silvetti A; Serrao M; Conforto S; Draicchio F
Ind Health; 2017 Oct; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.
Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR
Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
Chaffin DB; Page GB
Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Mar; 29(1):358-365. PubMed ID: 35253606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
Waters TR; Baron SL; Piacitelli LA; Anderson VP; Skov T; Haring-Sweeney M; Wall DK; Fine LJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):386-94; discussion 395. PubMed ID: 10065524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine?
Lavender SA; Li YC; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19308820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
Ciriello VM
Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Applied Ergonomics 29(6) 433-438.
Burdorf A; van der Beek A
Appl Ergon; 1999 Aug; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 10416850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.
Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Baron S
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9866167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
Waters T; Occhipinti E; Colombini D; Alvarez-Casado E; Fox R
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
