These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8339949)
1. The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry. Dengler-Harles M; Wild JM; Cole MD; O'Neill EC Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 231(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 8339949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients. Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices. Iester M; Mermoud A; Schnyder C Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 10690827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice. Rowe FJ; Czanner G; Somerville T; Sood I; Sood D Curr Eye Res; 2021 Jan; 46(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 32564629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Trope GE Ophthalmology; 1993 Jun; 100(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 8510911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Morales J; Weitzman ML; González de la Rosa M Ophthalmology; 2000 Jan; 107(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 10647732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter evaluation of tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) using the G1 grid. Gonzáles de la Rosa M; Morales J; Dannheim F; Papst E; Papst N; Seiler TJ; Matsumoto C; Lachkar Y; Mermoud A; Prünte C Eur J Ophthalmol; 2003; 13(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 12635672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Detectability of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Octopus automatic perimeter. A comparison between program G-1 and programs 31 and 32 and their combinations]. Gloor B; Gloor E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Jan; 188(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3754292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results. Johnson CA; Brandt JD; Khong AM; Adams AJ Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 113(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 7826296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry. Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Sommer A Ophthalmology; 1995 Jan; 102(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 7831036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters. Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jun; 87(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 12770962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry. Roberti G; Manni G; Riva I; Holló G; Quaranta L; Agnifili L; Figus M; Giammaria S; Rastelli D; Oddone F PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186793. PubMed ID: 29077730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma. O'Brien C; Poinoosawmy D; Wu J; Hitchings R Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 78(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7918261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression. Funkhouser A; Flammer J; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner HP Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 1577286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-pass resolution perimetry and light-sense perimetry in open-angle glaucoma. Meyer JH; Funk J Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 7492934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Wishart PK Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effective dynamic ranges of standard automated perimetry sizes III and V and motion and matrix perimetry. Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Zamba G Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 128(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 20457977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]