299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8339972)
1. [The methodology of choosing the materials for the means for individual protection from ionizing radiation].
Benetskiĭ BA; Gogin EE; Filatov VN
Gig Sanit; 1993 Jan; (1):51-3. PubMed ID: 8339972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation and chemical degradation of UVR protection characteristics of fabrics.
Khazova M; O'Hagan JB; Grainger KJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 17065196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation protection of medical staff.
Le Heron J; Padovani R; Smith I; Czarwinski R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20656429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interventional radiologists: a necessary evolution of leaded protective aprons design.
Guersen J; Cassagnes L; Mechin G; Ravel A; Dumousset E; Boyer L; Chabrot P
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):443. PubMed ID: 23433419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of sun protection for children's summer 2005 clothing collection.
Khazova M; O'Hagan JB; Grainger KJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 16998203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation shielding technology.
Shultis JK; Faw RE
Health Phys; 2005 Apr; 88(4):297-322. PubMed ID: 15761292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation shielding technology.
Shultis JK; Faw RE
Health Phys; 2005 Jun; 88(6):587-612. PubMed ID: 15891456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation protection tools in interventional radiology.
Schueler BA; Balter S; Miller DL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(11):844-5. PubMed ID: 23122355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Can Aprons Be Properly Evaluated for Their Protective Quality without In-House Validation?
Weissenborn M; Heithaus E; Weir V; Onofrio A; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1933-1935.e2. PubMed ID: 27886959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of non-lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery.
Scuderi GJ; Brusovanik GV; Campbell DR; Henry RP; Kwon B; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 16934731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of various methods for designing the shielding from ionising radiation at PET-CTinstallations.
Antić V; Stanković K; Vujisić M; Osmokrović P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Apr; 154(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 22899217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose reduction to radiosensitive tissues in CT. Do commercially available shields meet the users' needs?
McLaughlin DJ; Mooney RB
Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 15081850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Live Without Regret.
Marx MV
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 29471993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Secondary ionizing radiation generated by digital and analog coronary cineangiographic equipment: influence of external systems of radiologic protection].
Ramírez A; Farias E; Silva AM; Oyarzún C; Leyton F; Ugalde H; Dussaillant G; Cumsille MA
Rev Med Chil; 2000 Aug; 128(8):853-62. PubMed ID: 11129546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosemeters.
Schultz FW; Zoetelief J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16517567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Procedures, spectrum and radiation exposure in CT-fluoroscopy].
Stoeckelhuber BM; Schulz E; Melchert UH; Blobel J; Gellissen J; Gehl H; Weiss HD; Leibecke T
Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 14618963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
