These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8339972)

  • 1. [The methodology of choosing the materials for the means for individual protection from ionizing radiation].
    Benetskiĭ BA; Gogin EE; Filatov VN
    Gig Sanit; 1993 Jan; (1):51-3. PubMed ID: 8339972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation and chemical degradation of UVR protection characteristics of fabrics.
    Khazova M; O'Hagan JB; Grainger KJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 17065196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
    Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation protection of medical staff.
    Le Heron J; Padovani R; Smith I; Czarwinski R
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20656429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interventional radiologists: a necessary evolution of leaded protective aprons design.
    Guersen J; Cassagnes L; Mechin G; Ravel A; Dumousset E; Boyer L; Chabrot P
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):443. PubMed ID: 23433419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
    Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
    Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of sun protection for children's summer 2005 clothing collection.
    Khazova M; O'Hagan JB; Grainger KJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 16998203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation shielding technology.
    Shultis JK; Faw RE
    Health Phys; 2005 Apr; 88(4):297-322. PubMed ID: 15761292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation shielding technology.
    Shultis JK; Faw RE
    Health Phys; 2005 Jun; 88(6):587-612. PubMed ID: 15891456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation protection tools in interventional radiology.
    Schueler BA; Balter S; Miller DL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(11):844-5. PubMed ID: 23122355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can Aprons Be Properly Evaluated for Their Protective Quality without In-House Validation?
    Weissenborn M; Heithaus E; Weir V; Onofrio A; Rees C
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1933-1935.e2. PubMed ID: 27886959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of non-lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery.
    Scuderi GJ; Brusovanik GV; Campbell DR; Henry RP; Kwon B; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2006; 6(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 16934731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of various methods for designing the shielding from ionising radiation at PET-CTinstallations.
    Antić V; Stanković K; Vujisić M; Osmokrović P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Apr; 154(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 22899217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose reduction to radiosensitive tissues in CT. Do commercially available shields meet the users' needs?
    McLaughlin DJ; Mooney RB
    Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 15081850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
    Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Live Without Regret.
    Marx MV
    Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 29471993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Secondary ionizing radiation generated by digital and analog coronary cineangiographic equipment: influence of external systems of radiologic protection].
    Ramírez A; Farias E; Silva AM; Oyarzún C; Leyton F; Ugalde H; Dussaillant G; Cumsille MA
    Rev Med Chil; 2000 Aug; 128(8):853-62. PubMed ID: 11129546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosemeters.
    Schultz FW; Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16517567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Procedures, spectrum and radiation exposure in CT-fluoroscopy].
    Stoeckelhuber BM; Schulz E; Melchert UH; Blobel J; Gellissen J; Gehl H; Weiss HD; Leibecke T
    Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 14618963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.