These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8340487)

  • 21. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nasalance measures in German-speaking cleft patients.
    Swennen GR; Grimaldi H; Upheber J; Kramer FJ; Dempf R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):158-64; discussion 164. PubMed ID: 14704583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nasalance scores of children with repaired cleft palate who exhibit normal velopharyngeal closure during aerodynamic testing.
    Zajac DJ
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2013 Aug; 22(3):572-6. PubMed ID: 23813202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Same noses, different nasalance scores: data from normal subjects and cleft palate speakers for three systems for nasalance analysis.
    Bressmann T; Klaiman P; Fischbach S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):163-70. PubMed ID: 16428233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nasalance, nasality, voice, and articulation after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.
    Van Lierde KM; Van Borsel J; Moerman M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Laryngoscope; 2002 May; 112(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 12150621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Acoustic evaluation of voice in children with cleft palate].
    Gubrynowicz R; Eberhardt G; Chojnacka-Wadołowska D; Konopka C
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2002; 56(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 12053672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality compared to HONC measures: the role of experience.
    Laczi E; Sussman JE; Stathopoulos ET; Huber J
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Mar; 42(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15748113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate.
    Larangeira FR; Dutka Jde C; Whitaker ME; de Souza OM; Lauris JR; da Silva MJ; Pegoraro-Krook MI
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 26796470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Nasality Severity Index 2.0: Revision of an Objective Multiparametric Approach to Hypernasality.
    Bettens K; Van Lierde KM; Corthals P; Luyten A; Wuyts FL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e60-70. PubMed ID: 25794017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of nasalance and nasality in patients with a repaired cleft palate.
    Sinko K; Gruber M; Jagsch R; Roesner I; Baumann A; Wutzl A; Denk-Linnert DM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 274(7):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 28299425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
    Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children.
    Watterson T; Hinton J; McFarlane S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8849861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech segment duration measurements in adult speakers with repaired cleft palate and hypernasality.
    Leder SB; Lerman JW; Alfonso PJ
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Aug; 98(8 Pt 1):884-7. PubMed ID: 3398667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality.
    Lewis KE; Watterson TL; Houghton SM
    J Commun Disord; 2003; 36(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery.
    Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An acoustic study of the temporal characteristics of nasalization in children with and without cleft palate.
    Ha S; Sim H; Zhi M; Kuehn DP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 15352864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech outcome regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish children a year after pharyngeal flap surgery. A pilot study.
    Van Lierde KM; Bonte K; Baudonck N; Van Cauwenberge P; De Leenheer EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 18698142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children.
    van Doorn J; Purcell A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jul; 35(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 9684764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between nasalance scores and nasality ratings obtained with equal appearing interval and direct magnitude estimation scaling methods.
    Brancamp TU; Lewis KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Nov; 47(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 20500059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.