138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8340709)
21. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe.
Gerry MH; Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Health care professionals and treatment of HIV-positive patients. Is there an affirmative duty to treat under common law, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Americans with Disabilities Act?
White CC
J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):67-113. PubMed ID: 10230151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Intensive care treatment decisions: the roots of our confusion.
Clark FI
Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 8008547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The medical futility debate continues.
Struthers MS; Olson BC
Minn Med; 1995 Feb; 78(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 7891646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Conscience clauses offer little protection. Most are deficient, and many have been met with hostile judicial interpretations.
Wardle LD
Health Prog; 1993; 74(6):79-83. PubMed ID: 10127335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis.
Rosenblum VG; Grant ER
Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal trends in bioethics.
Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 11642948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Abortion: a tangle of rights.
Curtin LL
Nurs Manage; 1993 Feb; 24(2):26, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 8429970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1986 developments. National Legal Center Staff.
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):255-76. PubMed ID: 2951349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Family decisionmaking and forgoing treatment: a judicial perspective.
Shepard RT
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 7829304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Shapiro RS
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Natural death acts and right to die legislation.
Hallagan JB
Med Trial Tech Q; 1986; 32(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 11649842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A new predicament for physicians: the concept of medical futility, the physician's obligation to render inappropriate treatment, and the interplay of the medical standard of care.
Levine EM
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 11654456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cultural models and the future of bioethics.
Rodotà S
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():33-45. PubMed ID: 10134813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Legal trends in bioethics.
Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):252-4. PubMed ID: 11642849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Legal trends in bioethics.
Onel S; Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 1301833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Legal trends in bioethics.
Davis DS
J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 11644937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Mrs. Wanglie and "doctor knows best" and making decisions for those who cannot decide for themselves: autonomy in two recent cases.
Rouse F
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 1342345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports.
Vaux K
J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
