These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8340767)

  • 1. Local time horizons in Pavlovian learning.
    Barnet RC; Grahame NJ; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Jul; 19(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 8340767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of an extinguished CS on competition with another CS.
    Bills CH; Dopheide M; Pineño O; Schachtman TR
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 16457968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
    Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.
    Miller RR; Barnet RC; Grahame NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 1619393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: tests for the associative value of the context.
    Bouton ME; King DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Jul; 9(3):248-65. PubMed ID: 6886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing excitatory backward and forward conditioning.
    Chang RC; Stout S; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 14690847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
    Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning.
    Murphy RA; Baker AG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jul; 30(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 15279513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials.
    Gunther LM; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 10881603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping.
    Durlach PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Oct; 9(4):374-89. PubMed ID: 6644244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latent inhibition and contextual associations.
    Escobar M; Arcediano F; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 11987870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overshadowing of subsequent events and recovery thereafter.
    Burger DC; Mallemat H; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 10881606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Associative effects of US preexposure: modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context.
    Matzel LD; Brown AM; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jan; 13(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 3819652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms underlying retarded emergence of conditioned responding following inhibitory training: evidence for the comparator hypothesis.
    Schachtman TR; Brown AM; Gordon EL; Catterson DA; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jul; 13(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 3612027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of context-specificity of the CS-preexposure effect in Pavlovian excitatory and inhibitory conditioning.
    Nakajima S; Takahashi K; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 16675159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.
    Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Oct; 13(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 3668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proactive interference between cues trained with a common outcome in first-order Pavlovian conditioning.
    Amundson JC; Escobar M; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 14570518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a stimulus intervening between CS and US in autoshaping.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Apr; 8(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 7069375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time cues block the CS, but the CS does not block time cues.
    Williams DA; LoLordo VM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1995 May; 48(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 7597196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent exposure to a dangerous context impairs extinction and reinstates lost fear reactions.
    Morris RW; Furlong TM; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):40-55. PubMed ID: 15656726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.