172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8340823)
1. Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation.
Weinans H; Huiskes R; van Rietbergen B; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Galante JO
J Orthop Res; 1993 Jul; 11(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 8340823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems.
Van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R; Weinans H; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Galante JO
J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):369-82. PubMed ID: 8478342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between DEXA and finite element studies in the long-term bone remodeling of an anatomical femoral stem.
Herrera A; Panisello JJ; Ibarz E; Cegoñino J; Puértolas JA; Gracia L
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041013. PubMed ID: 19275442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of fit and bonding characteristics of femoral stems on adaptive bone remodeling.
Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
J Biomech Eng; 1994 Nov; 116(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 7869714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis.
Huiskes R; Weinans H; Grootenboer HJ; Dalstra M; Fudala B; Slooff TJ
J Biomech; 1987; 20(11-12):1135-50. PubMed ID: 3429459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results.
Turner AW; Gillies RM; Sekel R; Morris P; Bruce W; Walsh WR
J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):705-12. PubMed ID: 16022980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray image review of the bone remodeling around an osseointegrated trans-femoral implant and a finite element simulation case study.
Xu W; Robinson K
Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 36(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18197477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: clinical versus computer-simulation studies.
Huiskes R
Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():118-29. PubMed ID: 8116386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-term study of bone remodeling after femoral cemented stem implantation: comparison between DXA and finite element simulation.
Herrera A; Rebollo S; Ibarz E; Mateo J; Gabarre S; Gracia L
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 23725926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of glenoid prosthesis design on glenoid bone remodeling: adaptive finite element based simulation.
Sharma GB; Debski RE; McMahon PJ; Robertson DD
J Biomech; 2010 Jun; 43(9):1653-9. PubMed ID: 20394931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer simulation of trabecular remodeling in human proximal femur using large-scale voxel FE models: Approach to understanding Wolff's law.
Tsubota K; Suzuki Y; Yamada T; Hojo M; Makinouchi A; Adachi T
J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(8):1088-94. PubMed ID: 19403138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different hip prosthesis shapes considering micro-level bone remodeling and stress-shielding criteria using three-dimensional design space topology optimization.
Boyle C; Kim IY
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1722-8. PubMed ID: 21497816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Bone remodeling numerical simulation on the basis of bone adaptive theory].
Chen B; Zhao W; Sun Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 18610623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants.
Skinner HB; Kilgus DJ; Keyak J; Shimaoka EE; Kim AS; Tipton JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug; (305):178-89. PubMed ID: 8050227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss.
van Lenthe GH; Willems MM; Verdonschot N; de Waal Malefijt MC; Huiskes R
Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 12553509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty.
Bobyn JD; Glassman AH; Goto H; Krygier JJ; Miller JE; Brooks CE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):196-213. PubMed ID: 2245546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: an in vitro case.
Taylor WR; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Warner MD; Clift SE
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Jun; 7(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 15512756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
